Texas abortion funds fear jail time in post-Roe legal turmoil

Sign up for The Brief, our day by day e-newsletter that retains readers in control on probably the most important Texas news.

For years, the Frontera Fund hotline has helped residents of the Rio Grande Valley entry and pay for abortions in the area and out of state. But now, callers get only a recorded voicemail message:

“In light of the Supreme Court decision and the uncertainty around Texas law, we are forced to pause funding at this time,” the recording says. “We are working diligently with our lawyers and national partners to get through this crisis.”

As one in every of two full-time staffers on the Frontera Fund, Cathy Torres has been fielding these requires years. Now, every missed name breaks her coronary heart somewhat extra.

“I can’t even tell you why it’s still on my phone, because there’s nothing I can do for them,” she stated. “It’s just hard to remove it. It’s like a breakup.”

Frontera Fund is a part of a coalition of abortion funds that for years have helped Texans pay for abortions, each in Texas and out of state. These small, scrappy nonprofits have seen the demand for his or her providers develop in current years, at all times in lockstep with the state Legislature’s ever-tightening maintain over abortion entry.

But after final Friday’s U.S. Supreme Court determination overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade determination that legalized abortion, abortion funds’ work got here to a screeching halt.

The teams modified their outgoing voicemail messages, up to date their web sites and deployed social media posts, all with the same message: Due to the uncertainty surrounding Texas abortion legal guidelines, the state’s abortion funds had stopped funding abortions.

“It’s painful,” Torres stated. “Even though we knew it was coming and knew what it was going to be, it’s more painful than I could even tell you.”

Nothing in Texas’ tangled net of anti-abortion legal guidelines — together with legal guidelines from earlier than 1973 and a “trigger law” handed final 12 months — explicitly outlaws their work paying for Texans to entry abortions exterior the state.

But the legal guidelines don’t particularly permit it both, and Texas’ anti-abortion advocates have made it clear they’re eagerly awaiting the prospect to check these legal guidelines — and their legal penalties.

The Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade eliminated the decadeslong legal safety afforded to abortion suppliers, leaving their fates in the palms of native elected prosecutors and their interpretation of complicated state legal guidelines.

With abortion quickly to be solely inaccessible in Texas, abortion funds will develop into a extra essential useful resource for Texans who need assistance leaving the state — and a extra outstanding goal for anti-abortion advocates making an attempt to cease them.

Staff at these abortion funds don’t consider their help to sufferers in search of abortions exterior the state is illegitimate, and so they additionally aren’t keen to take the danger to search out out.

“We need to keep ourselves and our communities safe,” Torres stated. “It’s painful in so many ways, but we know that our safety comes first.”

Legal panorama

Last week’s Supreme Court determination gave Texas’ Republican elected officers a victory their celebration has been working towards for 50 years: the prospect to set their very own legal guidelines banning abortion.

Those identical elected officers promptly plunged the state right into a chaotic morass of conflicting legal guidelines that defied attorneys, consultants and abortion advocates alike.

“We’re struggling to even understand what the laws are and what this means for us because it’s all written so vaguely,” Torres stated. “And of course, that’s on purpose.”

In 2021, the Texas Legislature handed a “trigger law” that may make performing an abortion a second-degree felony punishable by as much as life in jail. That legislation goes into impact 30 days after the Supreme Court opinion turns into official, which is able to take no less than one other 25 days.

However, Attorney General Ken Paxton stated in an advisory Friday that some prosecutors could instantly pursue legal prosecutions primarily based on violations of Texas abortion legal guidelines predating Roe v. Wade that the Legislature by no means repealed.

“Although these statutes were unenforceable while Roe was on the books, they are still Texas law,” Paxton wrote. “Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions starting today.”

These pre-Roe statutes carry much less vital penalties — two to 5 years in jail, in comparison with 5 years to life — however are a lot broader, penalizing not solely somebody who performs an abortion, however anybody who “furnished the means” for one.

Fear of legal fees underneath these pre-Roe statutes prompted abortion clinics to instantly cease performing abortions on Friday. Texas abortion funds additionally stopped paying for abortions, citing legal confusion over whether or not such exercise would violate the statutes.

Courts have now begun what might be an extended and bitter strategy of checking out which Texas legal guidelines — the outdated pre-Roe legal legal guidelines, the six-week ban enforced by civil lawsuits or the looming legal “trigger” ban — will take precedent.

On Tuesday, a Harris County district decide ruled that the pre-Roe abortion ban “is repealed and may not be enforced consistent with the due process guaranteed by the Texas constitution.” Some clinics concerned in that legal problem stated they’d instantly resume abortion procedures; Paxton stated he would instantly attraction.

This ruling units an necessary precedent for different legal challenges however applies solely to the clinics named in the lawsuit and doesn’t instantly shield abortion funds. And the abortion funds are anxious about one thing way more probably damaging than a civil go well with — a check case in legal courtroom.

“The threat of felony prosecution is a real thing,” stated Elizabeth Myers, a associate on the legislation agency Thompson Coburn who represents abortion funds. “It’s going to be very difficult for anyone to take on the threat of criminal prosecution in order to test these theories because the harm inflicted by the criminal justice system is immediate.”

The consensus amongst legal consultants is that it will be troublesome to win a case in opposition to an abortion fund that paid for out-of-state care. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh tried to forestall the thought of interstate fees in a concurring opinion to Friday’s ruling.

“May a State bar a resident of that State from traveling to another State to obtain an abortion?” Kavanaugh requested. “In my view, the answer is no based on the constitutional right to interstate travel.”

But his opinion didn’t tackle the thornier query of paying for another person to journey out of state to acquire an abortion, and it doesn’t imply a prosecutor gained’t attempt to carry fees in opposition to an abortion fund.

“A lot of this is just fear of overzealous and rogue prosecutors in the state of Texas, which is a valid fear,” stated J. Alexander Lawrence, a lawyer at Morrison & Foerster LLP who has represented abortion clinics. “There’s a lot of concern that some prosecutor who wants to over-read these laws will go after individuals who help women … leave the state.”

And legal consultants say abortion funds are clever to be cautious proper now.

“Part of the difference in thinking about legal risk is a question of who you are,” stated Elizabeth Sepper, a legislation professor on the University of Texas at Austin. “People who are high profile or organizations that are high profile will have concerns that enterprising anti-choice prosecutors might bring criminal charges against them.”

Previous legal challenges

The advocates who run the Texas Equal Access Fund don’t have to invest about whether or not they are going to be focused by the anti-abortion motion.

The North Texas abortion fund has been recognized as a “criminal organization” in native abortion ban ordinances and obtained cease-and-desist letters from an anti-abortion lawmaker. In February, it was one in every of two abortion funds named in a legal petition alleging that it had “aided and abetted” in prohibited abortions.

Through all that, they simply stored funding, assured that they may beat again any legal challenges in courtroom. But that every one modified on Friday.

“When I first heard that we were gonna have to pause funding, I cried,” stated communications director Denise Rodriguez. “Because I knew what that impact was going to have on people, just because of how extreme these folks are trying to be when it comes to trying to stop people from accessing abortions.”

Texas’ abortion funds exist as a result of the state doesn’t make abortion simply accessible and reasonably priced, Rodriguez stated.

“We believe that abortion is a fundamental part of health care and that government should cover it, like all other health care,” Rodriguez stated. “But if the government isn’t going to do it, we will do it.”

These small nonprofit organizations depend on donations and occasional grant funding to take care of their shoestring workers, who’re chargeable for organizing volunteers, fundraising, promoting their providers and coordinating abortions in Texas and surrounding states.

Lilith Fund, the oldest abortion fund in Texas, was based in 2001, and its ranks have solely grown since, serving to principally low-income Texans entry abortions.

But now, these organizations, that are primarily led and staffed by folks of colour, are attempting to determine what dangers they’re keen to take as they steadiness the necessity to assist pay for abortion care out of state and the very actual risk of legal fees that didn’t exist every week in the past.

“We have talked about it and we are talking about it,” Rodriguez stated. “But we are also aware that we have a very racist criminal justice system [and] we can’t ignore that.”

And anti-abortion advocates are solely ramping up their efforts to criminalize abortion in the wake of Friday’s ruling.

In a press launch Tuesday, the anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life claimed they known as three abortion clinics on Monday to ask whether or not the clinics had been nonetheless offering abortions; in keeping with audio recordings supplied to The Texas Tribune, two of the clinics agreed to schedule appointments for the callers.

An worker affiliated with one of many clinics instructed the Tribune that they canceled all appointments on Friday, solely taking cellphone calls, and remained closed till Tuesday, once they started to supply solely ultrasound providers, not abortion procedures. The different two clinics didn’t reply to requests for remark for this story.

Texas Right to Life despatched the information to the district attorneys in Harris and Dallas counties, the place the clinics are positioned, urgent them to carry legal fees.

Prosecutors in some Texas counties have stated they don’t intend to carry abortion-related fees. Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot has stated he will not takes these cases, whereas Kim Ogg, Harris County’s district legal professional, told the Houston Chronicle she would resolve on a case-by-case foundation.

State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, has stated he’ll introduce laws that may permit prosecutors in different jurisdictions to carry abortion-related fees if the native prosecutor declines to. Cain didn’t reply to a request for touch upon Wednesday.

He has beforehand stated he’ll attempt to target abortion funds in addition to businesses that pay for his or her workers to go away the state to hunt legal abortions.

“There’s no federal constitutional right to pay for a woman to leave the state to kill a baby,” Cain wrote on Twitter on Monday.

Other states 

Since Texas banned abortions after about six weeks of being pregnant final September, abortion funds have seen the demand for his or her providers develop exponentially.

They’ve helped Texans get abortions in Oklahoma, Colorado, New Mexico and states even farther afield. In 2021, the Texas Equal Access Fund alone served 1,400 shoppers who in any other case wouldn’t have been capable of afford an abortion.

But nonetheless, the instances that persist with them, fund workers say, are people who they weren’t capable of assist: shoppers who couldn’t get the time off of labor, couldn’t discover somebody to observe their children or couldn’t depart the state on account of their immigration standing.

Add to the checklist all these shoppers that they’re presently not capable of serve whereas the brand new legal battles play out.

“It’s hard to be optimistic right now,” Rodriguez stated. “But I think that abortion funds are scrappy. We’ve been able to handle a lot up to now, and we’re lucky to have a strong network across the country.”

Karen Middleton, president of the Cobalt Colorado fund, stated she believes her group can present help to Texans and others in states with restrictive abortion legal guidelines to return to Colorado for abortions.

“Everyone is still unclear about the law and how it impacts people outside of Texas,” she stated, however “it’s our belief that we will fund anyone who needs care from anywhere.”

After Texas banned abortions after about six weeks of being pregnant, Cobalt Colorado supplied help on to Texans who wanted to go away the state.

“We will continue to provide support to anyone in Texas who is looking for help,” she stated.

Joan Lamunyon Sanford, govt director of New Mexico Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, which runs an abortion fund in New Mexico, stated the group seemingly would start offering transportation from Texas to New Mexico, slightly than serving to Texas sufferers as soon as they arrive.

“We recognize that’s something that we’re going to have to do,” she stated.

Meanwhile, Texas abortion funds are looking for different methods to assist. They’re energized by the sudden consideration on abortion rights and are attempting to mobilize that protest power into significant political advocacy.

And they’re awaiting the day once they get the inexperienced mild from their attorneys to begin funding abortions once more.

“I would do anything, anything to be able to fund more abortions, even just for a couple more weeks,” Frontera Fund’s Torres stated.

But it’s unclear when that may occur and what it will take to offer these funds confidence that they’re not going to face legal legal responsibility for his or her work.

“It’s not a simple question,” stated Seth Chandler, a professor on the University of Houston Law Center. “The activism over abortion and the end of Roe v. Wade has thrown us into a new legal terrain where we don’t have a lot of landmarks.”

Reporter Jolie McCullough contributed to this story.

Disclosure: University of Texas at Austin and University of Houston have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news group that’s funded in half by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Financial supporters play no position in the Tribune’s journalism. Find an entire list of them here.

Join us at The Texas Tribune Festival, occurring Sept. 22-24 in downtown Austin, and listen to from 300+ audio system shaping the way forward for Texas together with Joe Straus, Jen Psaki, Joaquin Castro, Mayra Flores and plenty of others. See all audio system introduced thus far and buy tickets.