Zombie virus found in Siberia can’t infect humans

If you’ve been on social media just lately, you’ve most likely seen headlines and posts a couple of so-called “zombie” virus revived from permafrost, or floor that continuously stays frozen, after practically 50,000 years. 

Some individuals on-line, together with news outlets, have claimed the virus has the “potential to be infectious” and could pose a threat to humans, sparking fears of one other pandemic like COVID-19. 

Can the “zombie” virus revived from Siberian permafrost after practically 50,000 years infect humans?

No, the “zombie” virus revived from Siberian permafrost after practically 50,000 years can’t infect humans.

Sign up for the VERIFY Fast Facts each day Newsletter!

European scientists revived 13 beforehand undiscovered viruses from seven samples of permafrost in Russia’s Siberian area, and found that they remained infectious, in response to a preprint paper that hasn’t but been peer-reviewed. 

But these viruses can’t infect humans, because the paper and its co-author Jean-Michel Claverie observe. 

The “zombie virus” preserved for practically 50,000 years belongs to a gaggle of viruses generally known as pandoraviruses. These viruses will not be recognized to infect humans, Clyde Schultz, Ph.D., a biology professor on the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada, noted in a 2019 research article. 

When VERIFY requested if the “zombie virus” poses a hazard to humans, Claverie stated, “Absolutely not.”

“This is a virus capable of infecting a specific amoeba called ‘acanthamoeba,'” he added.

The “zombie virus” was frozen beneath a lake for greater than 48,500 years, whereas scientists found different viruses in mammoth wool and a fossilized wolf’s intestinal contents buried beneath permafrost, amongst different samples. Some of the opposite viruses are additionally regarded as tens of hundreds of years outdated. 

More from VERIFY: No, Boston University did not create a COVID pressure with a human mortality fee of 80%

Though these specific viruses received’t make humans sick, the scientists consider their outcomes could be extrapolated to others able to infecting individuals or animals. Their paper notes it’s “likely” that permafrost, finally a lot older than 50,000 years, will finally launch unknown viruses upon thawing. 

“How long these viruses could remain infectious once exposed to outdoor conditions (UV light, oxygen, heat), and how likely they will be to encounter and infect a suitable host in the interval, is yet impossible to estimate,” the scientists wrote. “But the risk is bound to increase in the context of global warming when permafrost thawing will keep accelerating, and more people will be populating the Arctic in the wake of industrial ventures.”

This isn’t the primary time scientists have found viruses in permafrost, both. Their most up-to-date analysis expands upon a 2015 study in which Claverie and others revived a 30,000-year-old virus from Siberian permafrost. 

Although these particular viruses can’t infect humans, there’s a slight probability different viruses that emerge from melted permafrost in the longer term may pose a risk. 

Since the viruses recovered from permafrost up to now sometimes solely infect small organisms like amoebas, in normal “they are not expected to be public health threats,” Paulo Verardi, an affiliate professor of virology and vaccinology on the University of Connecticut, instructed VERIFY.

He added that we needs to be “aware and prepared” for potential viruses in the longer term.

“…From a public health perspective, the relative risk of an outbreak due to reemergence is very small (although not zero),” Verardi wrote in an electronic mail.

Verardi did observe that there’s additionally the potential for some eradicated viruses to make a comeback by means of melting permafrost. One instance is the virus that precipitated smallpox in humans, as it could have been preserved in the corpses of people that died from the virus. 

“The smallpox virus (variola virus), like these amoeba viruses, is very stable and therefore more likely to be revived. Most other viruses are easily degraded and inactivated over time,” he stated. “Regardless, at the moment we have more important and tangible viral threats to public health, such as SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).”