Voters back abortion rights, but some foes won’t relent. Is the commitment to democracy in question?

COLUMBUS, Ohio – The statewide battles over abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a constitutional proper to abortion have uncovered every other fault line: the commitment to democracy.

As citizens in state after state affirm their support for abortion rights, fighters are performing with escalating defiance towards the democratic processes and establishments they understand as aligned in opposition to their purpose.

Certain Republican elected officers and anti-abortion activists round the nation have replied to losses at the poll field by way of challenging election results, refusing to bring state laws into line with voter-backed adjustments, transferring to strip state courts of their power to imagine abortion-related legal guidelines and challenging the citizen-led ballot initiative procedure itself.

“We.Are.Not.Done.,” Ohio state Rep. Jennifer Gross declared on the social media platform X two days after citizens enshrined the right to abortion in the state structure previous this month. She and 25 different Republican lawmakers vowed to block the modification from reversing Ohio’s current abortion restrictions.

A powerful majority of Ohio citizens handed the modification, by way of kind of 57% to 43%. In reaction, the team of lawmakers mentioned in a joint observation: “We will do everything in our power to prevent our laws from being removed based upon perception of intent.”

Gross joined three fellow Republicans to go even further, proposing legislation to prevent Ohio courts from interpreting any cases related to the abortion-rights amendment, known as Issue 1. Similar efforts have emerged in six other states since state courts was the new abortion battleground after the Dobbs decision on June 24, 2022, that overturned Roe v. Wade.

Douglas Keith, senior counsel to the Brennan Center for Justice’s Judiciary Program, said abortion politics prompted successful efforts to limit the power of state courts in Montana and Utah and unsuccessful legislation in Alaska and Kansas. Such bills are attempts to dismantle the government’s system of checks and balances, he said.

“An attempt to strip the courts’ ability to interpret Issue 1 seems to me to be picking a fight with not just the courts, but with voters themselves,” Keith said in reference to the Ohio amendment.

That conflict was on display during a town hall hosted by Gross after her efforts to thwart the abortion-rights amendment were announced. A constituent who said she supported Issue 1, Emily Jackson, was incredulous.

“You’re ignoring the voice. The voice is there,” Jackson said. “We spoke.”

Gross advised Jackson she wasn’t ignoring citizens but reasonably used to be reflecting fighters’ issues that Ohio citizens have been led off track. The marketing campaign drew big money from outside the state for each side.

Gross did not return call and emails seeking additional comment.

Advocates contend that strict abortion laws also are undemocratic in the most basic sense because a majority of Americans oppose them. According to AP VoteCast, a nationwide survey of more than 94,000 voters, 63% of those who voted in the 2022 midterm elections said abortion should be legal in most or all cases. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll taken a year after the Supreme Court’s decision found that about two-thirds of Americans overall said abortion should generally be legal.

In all seven states the place abortion has been on the ballot since Roe v. Wade fell, citizens have both supported protective abortion rights or rejected an try to erode them.

That has led some Republicans who support abortion restrictions to target the ballot initiative process, a form of direct democracy that is available to voters in only about half the states.

“Thank goodness that most of the states in this country don’t allow you to put everything on the ballot because pure democracies are not the way to run a country,” said Rick Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania and one-time presidential candidate. He spoke about Ohio’s election results during an appearance on the conservative site NewsMax.

Another elected Republican, North Dakota state Rep. Brandon Prichard, weighed in on X, formerly Twitter, to encourage Republicans to defy the outcome of Ohio’s election.

“It could be an act of braveness to forget about the result of the election and now not permit for the homicide of Ohio small children,” he wrote.

Some political observers see a bigger threat in such sentiments.

Sophia Jordán Wallace, a political science professor at the University of Washington, mentioned “the frequency and the explicitness of these undemocratic attempts are increasing” and that they threaten to do long-term injury to American establishments and the public’s religion in them.

“And that injury is extremely tricky to undo,” she said.

For many abortion opponents, the issue is “a sacred cause, the thing that cannot be argued with,” one that may outweigh the importance of maintaining democratic practices, said Myrna Perez, associate professor of Gender and American Religion at Ohio University.

”Things aren’t static, so you’re trying to figure out a way to get the system to give you the results that you want,” she said.

Andrew Whitehead, affiliate professor of sociology at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, mentioned Christian nationalists, who’ve deep ties to the anti-abortion movement, have a history of viewing access to fundamental democratic processes such as voting not as a right but a privilege that should be afforded only to those who align with their beliefs.

“When it comes to enforcing their vision for America they think is ordained by God, they will set aside democracy,” Whitehead said.

Anti-abortion lawmakers and advocates already have pushed back in a handful of states where voters sided generally with abortion rights.

In Montana, citizens closing fall rejected a legislative referendum that will have criminalized a health care provider’s or nurse’s failure to supply lifesaving care to a toddler born alive after an attempted abortion; such cases typically involve severe medical problems. Republicans countered by passing a version of the rejected measure into law.

Kentucky Republicans selected to go away intact a state ban on abortion in any respect phases of being pregnant, even if citizens there defeated a measure that will have denied constitutional protections for the process.

In Ohio, some notable top Republicans are rejecting anti-democratic suggestions and standing up for voters.

“In this country, we accept the results of elections,” said GOP Gov. Mike DeWine, a leading opponent of Issue 1. Republican Attorney General Dave Yost tweeted that he “scoured” the Ohio Constitution, but found “no exception for matters in which the outcome of an election is contrary to the preferences of those in power.”

“All political power is inherent in the people,” he quoted the document as saying.

Republican state legislative leaders to start with pledged that the combat to prohibit abortion rights wasn’t over after citizens had spoken. But as their celebration grapples with the anti-abortion movement’s deep divisions, House Speaker Jason Stephens and Senate President Matt Huffman have gave the impression to melt their tone.

Stephens signaled he won’t advance Gross’s court-limiting bill. Huffman, a devout Catholic, walked back suggestions that he could pursue an immediate repeal of Issue 1.

They were among Ohio Republicans who defied their own law and called a special election in August aimed at raising the threshold for passing future constitutional amendments from a simple majority to 60%. The measure was widely seen as an attempt to undermine the fall abortion amendment and was soundly rejected.

The tensions already are evident for abortion initiatives planned for state ballots in 2024.

In Missouri, disputes over ballot language are complicating efforts by way of abortion-rights supporters to advance a statewide poll measure. A panel of judges closing month ruled that summaries written by Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, an abortion opponent who is running for governor next year, were politically partisan and misleading.

In Michigan, three Republican lawmakers joined an anti-abortion group in suing to overturn a state constitutional amendment protecting abortion rights that citizens handed with vast give a boost to closing yr. Florida’s Republican legal professional common is attempting to stay a proposed abortion rights modification off the 2024 poll.

“We saw voters make that connection in Ohio between abortion and democracy in that first special election,” said Kara Gross, legislative director at the ACLU of Florida. “And we have faith voters will be able to make that same connection elsewhere in 2024.”

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative right here. The AP is just accountable for all content material.