Trump’s comments risk tainting jury pool in federal election subversion case, special counsel says

WASHINGTON – Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith warned Tuesday that former President Donald Trump’s “daily” statements threaten to taint a jury pool in Washington in the felony case charging him with scheming to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump’s provocative comments about each Smith’s crew and U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan — who’s presiding over the case — had been a central factor because the indictment was once filed final month. Prosecutors have time and again signaled their issues concerning the affect of Trump’s social media posts and Chutkan explicitly cautioned towards inflammatory remarks from Trump that might intimidate witnesses or contaminate doable jurors.

The posts endured Tuesday each prior to and after the most recent fear flared, with Trump previous in the day circulating a New York Post tale about Chutkan on his Truth Social platform and overtly mocking the concept she might be truthful in his case. Later in the night, he issued some other post in which he attacked Smith as a “deranged” prosecutor with “unchecked and insane aggression.”

Tuesday’s grievance from the Justice Department underscores the level to which Trump’s social media assaults are checking out the persistence of prosecutors and risk exposing him to sanctions from the pass judgement on, who final week set an ordeal date of March 4, 2024, in an effort to stay the case shifting. Trump has confronted admonitions in different instances, too, with a situation of his free up in a separate prosecution in Atlanta being that he chorus from intimidating co-defendants, witnesses or sufferers in the case.

The matter surfaced once more in a dispute over a movement that the Justice Department stated it sought after to report below seal, with an accompanying redacted model to be filed at the public docket. Defense attorneys objected, countering that they have been entitled time to check the Justice Department’s filings and any proposed sealed reveals prior to they might be docketed.

But prosecutors stated it might untenable to take a number of weeks to make a decision whether or not “every ordinary filing that refers to Sensitive Materials may be docketed.”

“Such a requirement would grind litigation in this case to a halt, which is particularly infeasible given the pressing matters before the Court — including the defendant’s daily extrajudicial statements that threaten to prejudice the jury pool in this case, as described in the Government’s motion,” the Smith crew wrote.

Chutkan set time limits for subsequent week for added filings that she stated is also filed below seal.

Trump faces 3 different prosecutions but even so the federal election subversion case. He’s charged with 18 other people in a state case in Atlanta with plotting to overturn the result of the 2020 election in Georgia; faces federal charges from Smith accusing him of illegally hoarding classified documents; and is accused in New York of falsifying business records in reference to a hush cash fee to a porn actor.

____

Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP