Texas tries to prove Scott Panetti is sane enough to be legally executed

Sign up for The Brief, our day by day publication that retains readers up to pace on essentially the most important Texas news.

The state of Texas admits Scott Panetti is severely mentally unwell, repeatedly recognized with schizophrenia and paranoid delusions over 4 a long time, earlier than and after he murdered his in-laws in 1992.

Prosecutors settle for that Panetti thinks a tool was implanted in his tooth throughout a jail dental process to both spy on him or broadcast ideas into his mind. They concede that he falsely believes U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett visited him on demise row. And they acknowledge that he is certain he killed Joe and Amanda Alvarado 30 years in the past solely after an evil spirit named Sarge Ironhorse took over his physique.

But over a three-day listening to this week, the Texas Attorney General’s Office tried to persuade a federal decide that Panetti, unwell as he could be, retains enough sanity to legally be executed.

Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s precedents, all of the state should do to clear the constitutional barrier in opposition to executing the insane is prove that the 64-year-old has a “rational understanding” of why the state plans to kill him. In different phrases, so long as Panetti grasps the concept that he is to be executed for murdering folks, the remainder of his delusions are irrelevant.

As is the spectacle of Panetti’s 1995 trial, at which, representing himself, he tried to name to the stand witnesses like Jesus Christ and John F. Kennedy and questioned himself as “Sarge” on the stand utilizing totally different voices.

At this week’s federal courtroom listening to, the newest chapter in Texas’ 27-year effort to execute the person, the state tried to present that inside all his delusional statements, Panetti has made some feedback that point out he does perceive his impending execution.

As attorneys, psychologists and psychiatrists tried to type by Panetti’s chaotic thoughts over three days, the prisoner largely sat expressionless. Occasionally, he identified Bible passages to his attorneys or quickly patted his graying sandy hair flat onto his brow, jingling the chain connecting his wrist to his ankle. His raveled hair and shaggy white beard clashed with the button-down shirts and slacks his attorneys introduced him to put on.

Assistant Attorney General Jay Clendenin faulted Panetti for having instructed solely considered one of his two current evaluators that he believed he is a prophet, with an execution being the satan’s try to preserve him from saving souls. And the prosecutor voiced skepticism of Panetti’s earlier claims that he believes himself to be immortal and subsequently unable to be executed.

To make his level, Clendenin culled phrases and statements from in any other case largely illogical letters and recorded conversations which the state argues present a transparent understanding on Panetti’s half that an execution would lead to demise and that he is accountable for the Alvarados’ deaths.

Panetti’s consultants testified repeatedly with rising exasperation that the prosecutor was wrongly attempting to use rational pondering to make sense of Panetti’s irrational thoughts.

“You’re imposing logic and linearity on Mr. Panetti,” Mark Cunningham, a medical and forensic psychologist instructed the state’s attorneys. “And so if you were in that situation working with your logic and linear mind, that’s what you could conclude about your reaction to that. … His mind is not attempting to line up and make things consistent.”

Panetti’s recorded historical past of psychological sickness goes again greater than 4 a long time. Before going to jail, he had been hospitalized 14 occasions for psychotic conduct. He was repeatedly recognized with schizophrenia and located to be severely disabled, in accordance to courtroom data.

His first recorded indicators of sickness got here when he was 20, in accordance to his attorneys, after he was hospitalized in 1978 for extreme electrical burns suffered whereas working as a lineman. In 1986, he started expressing a delusion that he was battling Satan, burying his household’s furnishings within the yard to rid the house of the satan.

Two years earlier than killing the Alvarados, he was institutionalized for homicidal conduct towards his household and said the city was plotting in opposition to him. This delusion has endured, evolving into statements this yr to psychologists that Panetti believes his trial was unfair as a result of Gillespie County officers and residents had been concentrating on him to cowl up a big conspiracy, together with a pedophile ring wherein he has lengthy claimed his father-in-law was concerned.

In Fredericksburg in 1992, shortly after his spouse and toddler left him to keep along with her mother and father, Panetti roughly shaved his head, wearing camouflage fatigues and busted by his in-laws’ entrance door. He fatally shot the Alvarados, then took his spouse and youngster hostage for hours till surrendering to police after becoming a go well with.

Shortly earlier than his trial, he fired his attorneys and pleaded madness. He claimed he had been overtaken by “Sarge” when committing the murders whereas off his antipsychotic medication however had since been cured of his psychological sickness by God. Aside from a brief interval after the trial, he has not taken medicine for his schizophrenia since, insisting to this present day he is not unwell.

His attorneys label the trial “a mockery of the criminal justice system.”

“Mr. Panetti rambled incessantly and incoherently, perseverated on irrelevant issues, engaged in bizarre behavior, badgered witnesses, and exasperated the judge,” his attorneys mentioned in a press release earlier this month. “He visibly frightened the jurors.”

After being discovered responsible and sentenced to demise, his appeals have centered nearly completely on whether or not he was mentally competent to characterize himself, to stand trial or to be executed. After his first execution date was set in 2004, the query of his competency made it to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 2007, the justices set new courtroom precedent beneath his title, elevating the bar on the constitutional restriction in opposition to executing the insane. Instead of weighing whether or not the prisoner merely had a factual consciousness of the state’s purpose for executing him, the courtroom dominated he should even have a rational understanding of it as nicely.

“Gross delusions stemming from a severe mental disorder may put an awareness of a link between a crime and its punishment in a context so far removed from reality that the punishment can serve no proper purpose,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote within the courtroom’s 5-4 opinion.

Frustrating attorneys, judges and psychological well being professionals within the 15 years since, Kennedy conceded it was tough to know what can be outlined as a rational understanding.

After one other yearslong spherical of opinions, the courts accepted Panetti was competent, main to a brand new execution date being set in 2014. The U.S. fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stopped it on the final minute, nonetheless, agreeing {that a} thorough, renewed have a look at his competency was warranted.

Panetti’s prolonged appeals can’t be seen as gaming the system, Judge Patrick Higginbotham wrote in 2017, as a result of Panetti himself continues to argue he is competent and not unwell.

“He has a long history of mental illness that predates his crime and following a judicial determination of his competency to be executed, he experienced a delay of another decade of solitary,” he mentioned.

So started what Higginbotham referred to as “another chapter in this judicial plunge into the dark forest of insanity and death directed by the flickering and inevitably elusive guides.” U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin marked days off his calendar this week to as soon as once more hear arguments on whether or not Panetti’s extreme schizophrenia is enough to qualify him as insane by federal execution requirements.

“It is unprecedented to be litigating on an execution competency claim for 20 years now,” Greg Wiercioch mentioned in his opening statements Monday, pausing as Panetti interrupted by loudly whispering to considered one of his different attorneys, a Bible verse quotation standing out throughout the chatter.

During courtroom breaks, the 4 jail officers who accompanied Panetti would enable him to stroll shut to the rail separating the courtroom pews and converse to his sister, brother-in-law and son. He talked quick and loud about tales from the previous, actual or imagined, together with birthdates, titles and namesakes of individuals included. His kin nodded alongside, smiling sadly. Other occasions he sat on the desk and talked to nobody specifically, the present proceedings by no means developing in his speech.

The psychological well being professionals who evaluated Panetti for the listening to all agreed the prisoner didn’t perceive that the courtroom was weighing whether or not or not he was match for execution. He believed, they mentioned, that the listening to would get him a brand new trial, the place he might increase proof he says had been hidden in a conspiracy in opposition to him to prove he was insane on the time of the murders and be freed.

He desires to be discovered competent, they mentioned, as a result of he believes that may enable him to stand trial a second time.

In greater than 4 hours of analysis this July, nonetheless, a forensic psychiatrist employed by Panetti’s authorized crew mentioned Panetti instructed him the state claims it desires to execute him for killing the Alvarados, however that’s not the true purpose.

Instead, he instructed Dr. Bhushan Agharkar that he is a prophet, and the satan desires to cease him from saving souls. He additionally mentioned it was to cowl up a conspiracy he’s found about Fredericksburg, involving a pedophilia and drug ring that his father-in-law was concerned in.

“He believes he’s being executed so he’ll stop preaching, it’s the devil and to cover up this conspiracy he discovered about his town,” Agharkar testified. “He’s saying that’s the reason they’re going to give, but this is what’s going on.”

The state tried to undercut these delusional statements by questioning why Panetti would point out them to Agharkar however not to the psychologist employed by the state who additionally spent 4 hours with the prisoner inside a day of Agharkar’s interview.

Psychologist Timothy Proctor finally opined that whereas Panetti is severely mentally unwell, he is nonetheless competent for execution as a result of he understood rationally he was to be executed for the Alvarados’ murders. When requested about issues like immortality or the execution, he believed Panetti was doubtless being evasive.

“It seems like when it got to that topic, beyond his flight of ideas, there was a tendency to not want to say some specific things,” Proctor mentioned.

He mentioned Panetti even indicated he feared saying some issues that would be used in opposition to him. But when Clendenin tried to give attention to Panetti’s inconsistency in spouting his execution-related delusions, Pitman, who was largely quiet throughout the proceedings, interrupted to specific skepticism over why Panetti would deliberately maintain again from the state one thing that will profit him.

Cunningham had supplied an alternate to deliberate evasiveness as an alternative as Panetti’s thoughts triggering much more disorganized ideas round tough matters.

“The topic area is one that’s more emotionally loaded, and Mr. Panetti’s tolerance for that issue may be very limited,” he mentioned.

After almost two days of makes an attempt to dissect the load of particular fantasies in a clearly delusional thoughts, Pitman lastly jumped in to strive to decipher how to legally react to a psychological puzzle. The decide is not anticipated to rule on Panetti’s competence till subsequent yr.

“Are we asking the right question?” he requested the state’s psychologist, referring to the rational understanding authorized commonplace.

“If Mr. Panetti’s ability to make rational interpretation of reality is so compromised by a pervasive mental illness as to render his rational thinking unstable, inconsistent, intermittent, unpredictable, then how can we conclude that as to any specific question such as those that are at play in this legal community, his understanding is rational rather than delusional at any given time or place?” the decide posed.

“What confidence can I have about any understanding that he might have about anything?”

Before the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on merciless and weird punishment was enacted within the 1700s, frequent legislation protections existed to stop the executions of “idiots” and “lunatics.” In the trendy demise penalty period, the U.S. Supreme Court has adopted the language of such frequent legal guidelines, ruling that such a killing would be a “miserable spectacle.”

In the final 20 years, nonetheless, Wiercioch pointed to two executions in Texas alone that appeared to match the invoice of such a spectacle.

Monty Delk, executed in 2002 for murdering a person promoting his automotive in 1986, instructed jail officers within the execution chamber that he was the warden, saying “get your Warden off this gurney and shut up. I am from the island of Barbados.”

Two years later, the state executed Kelsey Patterson for killing two folks in 1992. Asked if he had a remaining assertion, Patterson mentioned “Statement to what.”

“Get my money. Give me my rights. Give me my rights. Give me my rights. Give me my life back,” the assertion ended, in accordance to jail data.

“When Scott Panetti is buckled to the gurney in the execution chamber, can we be assured there won’t be another spectacle that occurred when Monty Delk and Kelsey Patterson were executed?” Wiercioch requested the courtroom.

His colleague later posed the identical query to Proctor, the psychologist who believed Panetti is competent to be executed.

“It’s probably likely … that there’s going to be some sort of disturbance,” Proctor mentioned.