Texas environmentalists push the EPA to crack down on methane emissions

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s day by day publication that retains readers up to pace on the most important Texas news.

The Environmental Protection Agency received an earful from Texans this month.

In a marathon three-day public listening to, shut to 300 individuals throughout the nation gave feedback on the company’s supplemental proposal to scale back methane in oil and pure fuel operations. Many referred to as in from Texas, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and different oil and fuel producing states that drive U.S. methane emissions.

The public remark interval closes on Feb. 13, and the EPA will challenge the closing rule later this yr. The rule is a cornerstone of the EPA’s technique below President Joe Biden to scale back greenhouse fuel emissions. The rule can have the largest influence in oil and fuel producing states like Texas that do not need broad methane laws. Texas businesses tasked with regulating the oil and fuel business have questioned a number of provisions of the proposed rule.

Oil and pure fuel operations are the largest industrial methane supply in the U.S. According to the Environmental Defense Fund’s Permian MAP project, the Permian Basin — unfold between West Texas and southeastern New Mexico — is the highest methane-emitting oil and fuel basin in the nation. Methane is a major part of pure fuel.

“I’ve seen firsthand how these small, low-producing wells contribute to methane and greenhouse gas pollution,” stated Sheila Serna, local weather science and coverage director at the Rio Grande International Study Center in Laredo. “And how the TCEQ [the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality], whose mission statement is to protect human health and the environment, has greatly failed us.”

Serna was beforehand a TCEQ air emissions investigator in Webb County, which comprises a part of the Eagle Ford Shale formation.

“We need strong rules like this to come down from the EPA,” she stated in an interview. “Because states that are resistant to regulating this sector will need to comply.”

Texas shall be a proving floor for EPA methane laws

Methane follows carbon dioxide as the second-most-abundant human-caused greenhouse fuel. Because methane is stronger at trapping warmth in the environment than CO₂, decreasing methane emissions is considered one of the handiest short-term measures to sluggish the tempo of local weather change.

The EPA launched the methane rule in November 2021, and in November 2022 launched the supplemental rule to strengthen and increase on the unique proposal. The supplemental rule would cut back methane emissions by 87% beneath 2005 ranges by 2030. It would additionally scale back unstable natural compounds (VOCs) and poisonous air emissions, together with benzene, from oil and methane fuel operations.

The supplemental proposal contains provisions to make sure that all wells are monitored for leaks, stop leaks from deserted wells and create a “super emitter” program to shortly determine and report massive methane leaks. Vast portions of methane leak from wells and pipelines.

The rule’s success will hinge on implementation in the nation’s largest oil and fuel fields. The Permian Basin alone accounts for 40% of the U.S. oil provide and 15% of the fuel provide.

“Politically in Texas we have not been able to get the two main state agencies to take methane seriously,” stated Cyrus Reed, conservation director for the Lone Star Sierra Club. “TCEQ does not have specific state rules on methane pollution so we really need the federal government to step in because our state agencies are not going to act.”

The proposed rule would crack down on venting and flaring, that are nonetheless routine practices in Texas oil and fuel fields. Flaring includes burning methane at the wellhead, both to scale back strain as a security precaution or, extra usually, to get rid of undesirable pure fuel that surfaces as a byproduct of oil extraction.

Methane may merely be “vented” at the wellhead — launched straight into the environment.

Flaring methane is preferable to merely venting it as a result of burning the fuel turns it into carbon dioxide, which is much less warming. But each flaring and venting, past their influence on local weather change, pose severe well being threats to close by residents. Flaring releases a wide range of hazardous air pollution, together with VOCs, and contributes to ground-level ozone, a pollutant that causes respiratory sickness and coronary heart illness.

In 2021 the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates oil and fuel operators, issued 3,351 permits permitting fossil gas extractors to vent and flare pure fuel. Under Texas’ administrative code, flaring isn’t supposed to happen with out exceptions granted below the fee’s Rule 32, which the Railroad Commission nearly by no means denies.

Railroad Commission communications director R.J. DeSilva stated the company has taken “extensive steps to reduce flaring in recent years” and stated the flaring price has dropped by greater than 70% since June 2019.

While the variety of flaring permits has declined since 2019, organizations including Earthworks have documented that many flares in the Permian Basin are unpermitted.

Last yr, college students at Arizona State University’s Roy Howard Center for Investigative Journalism analyzed data from satellites geared up with Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite devices ready to detect methane leaks and in contrast these outcomes from 2012 by 2020 with totals for flaring and venting reported to regulators by fossil gas corporations. In Texas, the methane emissions detected by the satellites have been nearly double the quantity reported by the corporations for flared and vented fuel.

The TCEQ regulates air emissions from drilling websites. TCEQ spokesperson Victoria Cann stated that controlling methane is a co-benefit of current company laws for VOCs, which trigger most cancers and hurt people’ nervous, respiratory and immune methods. VOCs additionally assist kind smog-producing ozone and particulate matter, which might lead to coronary heart, lung, respiratory issues and early dying.

Cann stated compliance is evaluated throughout routine investigations and in response to complaints.

On the different facet of the Permian Basin, New Mexico’s financial system additionally relies upon on the oil and fuel sectors. But the Democrat-controlled Legislature has handed new emissions laws. Many New Mexico residents have submitted feedback to the EPA, urging a powerful stance on methane emissions.

“New Mexico supports the U.S. EPA’s efforts to create a national rule that levels the playing field across states,” stated New Mexico Environment Department spokesperson Matthew Maez.

In 2021, New Mexico prohibited venting and flaring at new and current wells. In 2022, the state adopted the NMED oil and fuel air emission rule, which additionally targets methane emissions. But Maez famous the company’s enforcement capability is proscribed as a result of the New Mexico Legislature has not funded extra air high quality inspectors.

Texas regulators haven’t been receptive to the EPA regulating methane.

“These continued anti-oil and -gas policies will kill jobs, stifle economic growth, and make America more reliant of foreign nations to provide reliable energy,” Railroad Commission Chair Wayne Christan said in November 2021, when the methane rule was first launched.

TCEQ submitted public comments on the preliminary proposed rule in January 2022, questioning the EPA’s authority to implement the rule. The TCEQ feedback opposed the inclusion of deserted wells and lots of small-scale oil and fuel operators in the rule. The company stated the rule’s financial impacts had been underestimated and the social advantages overestimated.

TCEQ spokesperson Cann stated the company is reviewing the supplemental proposal and shall be submitting extra feedback. DeSilva, of the Railroad Commission, stated the company may also be offering additional feedback to the EPA. Both businesses submitted requests for an extension to the public remark interval.

“The process is flawed”: Texas advocates name for sturdy federal rule

Many of these giving public remark to the EPA had in depth expertise working on air high quality and oil and fuel points. One was impartial guide James Tim Doty, who labored for 17 years on the TCEQ’s cellular air monitoring unit.

“Environmental pollution in the state of Texas, the Permian Basin, is unlike anything I have ever seen,” he stated.

“We have no idea how many methane emissions are out there,” he stated, urging the EPA to undertake the rule. “The process is flawed.”

Reed, of the Sierra Club, stated the supplemental rule improved on the preliminary rule the EPA proposed in 2021. He was glad to see the rule contains each new and current oil and fuel wells. Reed stated it will be significant for the EPA to undertake provisions that cowl smaller operators and low-producing oil wells.

“If we’re trying to cut down and eliminate methane pollution, it is actually some of those low-producing wells that are the biggest problem,” he stated. “Not subjecting them to these rules would be going backwards.”

Serna, of the Rio Grande International Study Center, stated the methane debate is much from over and oil and fuel operators are probably to contest provisions of the EPA rule. But she was inspired by the sturdy displaying of help for the rule throughout the public hearings.

“I submitted my comment on day one,” she stated. “It was great to see communities all around the United States come together.”

Disclosure: The Environmental Defense Fund has been a monetary supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Financial supporters play no function in the Tribune’s journalism. Find an entire list of them here.