Texas district attorney offices could become new abortion battleground

Sign up for The Brief, our day by day publication that retains readers in control on essentially the most important Texas news.

A number of weeks in the past, within the growing old, sand-colored Starr County Courthouse, 12 common residents gathered to determine whether or not there was cause to consider a homicide might have been dedicated.

Grand jury proceedings are one-sided, with solely the district attorney’s workplace permitted to supply proof. They’re additionally stored secret, so it’s unknown who from the Starr County district attorney’s workplace dealt with the case and the way it was introduced to the jurors.

But from that listening to, the grand jury determined there was cause to cost 26-year-old Lizelle Herrera with homicide for a “self-induced abortion.” Herrera was arrested on a $500,000 bond and booked into the Starr County Jail despite the fact that Texas’ homicide statute explicitly prohibits bringing homicide costs in opposition to a pregnant individual within the “death of an unborn child.”

Three days after the preliminary arrest, Starr County District Attorney Gocha Ramirez stated he can be exercising “prosecutorial discretion” by dropping the costs.

“In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her,” he wrote in a press launch.

Several legal professionals and advocates in Starr County — a tiny, rural county within the Rio Grande Valley — informed the Texas Tribune that they consider this disastrous misstep from Ramirez’s workplace was born out of prosecutorial inexperience, not anti-abortion animus. Ramirez, a Democrat elected in 2020, didn’t reply to requests for remark.

But the case shines a light-weight on the large and sometimes unchecked energy that native prosecutors wield in deciding which instances to pursue, what costs to push for and what proof to current to grand juries, an influence that can become solely extra consequential if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the constitutional safety for abortion this summer season.

The function of district attorneys in abortion instances

Nearly 50 years after it was determined, Roe v. Wade is likely one of the nation’s greatest identified and most consequential Supreme Court rulings. But initially, it was only a lawsuit introduced by a lady — generally known as Jane Roe — in opposition to a Texas district attorney, Henry Wade.

Wade was not a virulent abortion opponent; in response to the Washington Post, he by no means even learn the Supreme Court choice that bore his title.

But legal professionals representing Roe wanted somebody to sue in the event that they had been going to get the courts to overturn Texas’ complete ban on abortions.

As elected prosecutor for Dallas County, Wade had the ability to deliver costs in opposition to any county resident who violated the regulation. To block Texas’ abortion regulation, Roe’s legal professionals must begin by blocking Wade. So they filed a swimsuit difficult Wade’s authority to implement a regulation they alleged was overly obscure and violated the proper to private privateness.

In the tip, in fact, this case blocked greater than only one native district attorney — the U.S. Supreme Court, in a transfer that shocked many and stoked 50 years of controversy, dominated that there was a constitutional safety for abortion as much as the purpose of fetal viability exterior the womb, usually thought of to start at 24 weeks gestational age. No district attorney in any jurisdiction in the entire nation could deliver costs in opposition to somebody merely as a result of they carried out or obtained a authorized abortion.

But now, the U.S. Supreme Court is reconsidering that call. If the court docket overturns Roe v. Wade this summer season, as many consider they’ll, particular person district attorneys might as soon as once more become liable for deciding if and when to pursue legal costs in abortion instances.

Texas has a “trigger” regulation on the books that will robotically make it a felony to “knowingly perform, induce or attempt an abortion” besides to avoid wasting the lifetime of the pregnant individual.

That regulation doesn’t permit for the pregnant individual to be prosecuted for having an abortion, however it might open up a complete world of authorized questions that district attorneys, protection legal professionals and medical suppliers must navigate.

“In that first, let’s say, five years of prosecution, how many mistakes get made along the way while the law is being developed?” requested Missy Owen, a North Carolina-based attorney and board member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. “And whose lives have to pay for it?”

Prosecutorial discretion

Many abortion rights advocates speak concerning the “two Americas” that will be created if the Supreme Court permits states to create their very own abortion restrictions. About half of all states doubtless would ban abortion to a point, in response to the Guttmacher Institute.

But even inside Texas, there could also be two distinct realities. Five Texas district attorneys — from Dallas, Travis, Bexar, Nueces and Fort Bend counties — have publicly promised that they won’t pursue abortion-related legal costs if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Others are anticipated to quietly decline to take these instances.

Travis County District Attorney José Garza stated he doesn’t consider his workplace ought to be concerned in criminalizing private medical selections between a pregnant individual and their physician.

“We are very focused on holding accountable people who commit acts of violence in our community,” he stated. “Pulling resources away from that to focus on this kind of case would be reckless and endanger the safety of our community.”

In different jurisdictions, although, district attorneys might take an reverse strategy, both as a result of private anti-abortion leanings or political strain.

Owen, who authored a report on abortion-related criminalization, stated there’s a helpful foreshadowing in how voter fraud instances have performed out in recent times.

“These cases don’t get prosecuted evenly across the state,” she stated. “They get prosecuted selectively, often in counties where there’s a district attorney’s race going on. … It’s really up to the discretion of the particular district attorney.”

Prosecutorial discretion provides district attorneys loads of energy in their very own jurisdiction — energy to take instances or not, to determine what costs to current and to decide on methods to body proof to the grand jury.

There’s not a lot oversight of how prosecutors wield that discretion, stated Charles “Rocky” Rhodes, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston.

“Except that there’s always political checks on them for failing to prosecute crimes that their citizens want prosecuted,” he stated. “That’s how you get defeated next time you run for district attorney.”

But state Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, is planning to introduce laws that could seriously change that stability of energy.

In a letter despatched to abortion-funding nonprofits final month, Cain stated he intends to introduce laws that will permit district attorneys to prosecute abortion-related instances exterior their dwelling jurisdiction “when the local district attorney fails or refuses to do so.”

Garza, the Travis County district attorney, stated Cain’s statements don’t change his pondering on these instances.

“All I can say is that the courts and the state constitution have been very clear that elected district attorneys have sole criminal jurisdictions in their community,” he stated.

The subsequent frontiers

But Cain’s proposition does level to a looming query: If Roe v. Wade is overturned and the set off regulation goes into impact, what’s subsequent?

If the set off regulation goes into impact, Rhodes stated it’s doubtless that abortion clinics will adjust to the regulation, as they’ve since Texas handed a ban on abortions after about six weeks of being pregnant. The consideration, he stated, will then shift to the myriad different methods individuals entry abortion care when clinics aren’t an choice.

“There are going to be some very difficult constitutional issues that we can already see,” Rhodes stated. “States may try to criminalize advocacy and [financial] assistance [for abortions] or may try to keep women from having an abortion in another state.”

District attorneys doubtless would find yourself on the entrance strains of check instances, authorized challenges and new legislative efforts to rein in what’s left of abortion entry in Texas.

And despite the fact that the set off regulation prohibits prosecution of the one who bought the abortion, many advocates fear most concerning the pregnant Texans who will get caught in these authorized battles — maybe with out enough protection.

“Most criminal defense lawyers don’t have any idea about fetal maternal medicine,” stated Owen. “This is a dangerous situation that will be an added stress to public defenders’ offices, to defense bars and to prosecutors.”

While the small print of the Herrera case stay murky, Owen stated it’s a harbinger of what might play out over the approaching months and years because the authorized system navigates a brand-new algorithm.

“We see the damage that occurs, right at the moment of charging. While the law and the lawyers are figuring it all out, people’s lives will be marred forever,” she stated. “We’ve seen what happens. You and I both know Lizelle Herrera’s name.”

We can’t wait to welcome you in individual and on-line to the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival, our multiday celebration of massive, daring concepts about politics, public coverage and the day’s news — all going down simply steps away from the Texas Capitol from Sept. 22-24. When tickets go on sale in May, Tribune members will save huge. Donate to affix or renew right this moment.