Texas AG Ken Paxton negotiates settlement with his offices’ whistleblowers

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s day by day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on essentially the most important Texas news.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s authorized crew is in settlement negotiation talks with three of the 4 former workers who filed a whistleblower lawsuit in opposition to him for firing them after they accused Paxton of legal acts.

Paxton’s legal professionals, in a joint filing last week with attorneys for Mark Penley, David Maxwell and Ryan Vassar — Paxton’s former deputies — requested the Texas Supreme Court to place the whistleblower case on maintain to present the events time to barter a settlement. The legal professionals wrote they have been “actively engaged in settlement discussions” with mediation set for Wednesday.

Lawyers for a fourth plaintiff, Blake Brickman, opposed the movement in their very own submitting and urged the court docket to maneuver ahead with its consideration. The news was first reported by The Dallas Morning News.

The high-profile case has been one more black eye for Paxton, a Republican whose litany of authorized troubles have adopted him all through a lot of his tenure as legal professional common and at instances alienated him from different GOP state officers. Paxton was indicted on securities fraud costs in August 2015. That case is still pending and Paxton has denied wrongdoing. More lately, Paxton was sued final 12 months by the Texas State Bar for professional misconduct for misrepresenting that he had uncovered new proof to file a lawsuit to problem the outcomes of the 2020 presidential elections in 4 battleground states. Paxton has maintained the swimsuit is politically motivated and denied wrongdoing.

The case stems from allegation in October 2020 by eight former high Paxton aides who reported to authorities that the attorney general had abused his office and accepted a bribe in exchange for helping a political donor with his business affairs. The whistleblowers additionally alleged that Paxton, who’s married, helped the donor as a result of the donor had given Paxton’s alleged girlfriend a job. Those stories led to an FBI investigation. No federal costs have been filed. All eight of the employees were either fired or resigned from the legal professional common’s workplace after making the grievance.

In November 2020, 4 of these former workers filed a whistleblower lawsuit in opposition to Paxton saying they’d been fired in retaliation. They sought reinstatement and compensation for misplaced wages, in addition to pay for future misplaced earnings and damages for emotional ache and struggling.

Paxton has argued in state court docket that he’s exempt from the Texas Whistleblower Act as a result of he’s an elected official, not a public worker and that he fired them not in retaliation for his or her grievance, however due to personnel disagreements. An appeals court has dominated in opposition to him and allowed the case to maneuver ahead. But final January, Paxton appealed his case to the Texas Supreme Court.

The joint submitting by Paxton’s legal professionals and the three plaintiffs says the court docket ought to defer its evaluation of the case till Feb. 9 to present the events a possibility to resolve the problem outdoors of the courtroom.

Paxton’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Brickman’s legal professionals, Thomas Nesbitt and William T. Palmer, stated of their submitting that Paxton’s crew has been delaying the case for 2 years and “there is no reason for abating this case.” They argued that the opposite plaintiffs sought the pause solely as a result of they supposed to settle the case, however since Brickman was not concerned in these negotiations, his claims nonetheless wanted a fast decision.

“Brickman respectfully requests that this Court deny the request for abatement,” they wrote. “It imposes further needless delay of the adjudication of Brickman’s claim.”