State regulators approve controversial Texas electricity market reform

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s every day publication that retains readers up to the mark on probably the most important Texas news.

The Public Utility Commission voted Thursday to make a considerable change to the state’s electricity market in a controversial effort to get the entire system to be extra dependable. The company stated it is going to let the Legislature evaluation its plan earlier than shifting ahead with placing it in place.

The concept, often called the “performance credit mechanism,” is a first-of-its-kind proposal. It’s meant to assist produce sufficient energy when excessive warmth or chilly drives up demand and electricity manufacturing drops for varied causes — similar to an absence of solar or wind to supply renewable vitality or tools breakdowns at gas- or coal-fired energy crops.

Under the brand new idea, which nonetheless has many particulars to work out, corporations similar to NRG would decide to being obtainable to supply extra vitality throughout these tight instances. The corporations would promote credit to electricity retailers similar to Gexa Energy, municipal utilities and co-ops that promote energy to properties and companies.

The credit are designed to offer energy turbines an added earnings stream and make constructing new energy crops worthwhile.

Theoretically, the credit assist retailers and clients by smoothing out unstable value spikes when demand is excessive — however there’s broad disagreement over whether or not this can occur in follow. Some electricity suppliers filed for bankruptcy after the 2021 winter storm as a result of they needed to pay a lot for energy.

Critics of the plan say the thought is dangerous as a result of it wasn’t correctly analyzed and has by no means been examined in one other place. Members of the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce wrote to the PUC in December that they’d “significant concern” about whether or not the proposal would work.

After the PUC vote, state Sen. Charles Schwertner, R-Georgetown, shared a letter on Twitter calling the choice “a substantial departure from the legislative intent” of the invoice that lawmakers handed in 2021 that required the grid to be mounted.

A guide for the PUC estimated the credit may price retailers $5.7 billion a 12 months, an quantity they stated might be considerably offset by an general lower in vitality prices. Still, specialists argue that shopper payments would enhance beneath the plan, though they disagree about how a lot payments would rise.

This is of explicit concern to teams such because the Texas Association of Manufacturers, which incorporates industrial services that use a big quantity of electricity and count on they might see bigger payments.

But corporations that generate energy assist the plan as a result of they are saying the credit will give them a purpose to construct new, wanted energy technology services to fulfill demand in a rising state. Gov. Greg Abbott has additionally indicated assist for the thought.

PUC Chair Peter Lake, whom Abbott appointed, pushed it ahead Thursday.

“I think we cannot only defend the product itself but … we can defend the process,” Lake stated earlier than calling for a vote.

PUC commissioners have been engaged on the best way to enhance the state’s electrical grid — which largely operates independently of different grids within the nation — since shortly after the February 2021 storm that left hundreds of thousands with out electricity for days in freezing climate. When the grid got here near collapse, tons of of individuals died on account of hypothermia and different causes.

After the storm, the Legislature directed the PUC to organize the grid for excessive climate and for instances when photo voltaic and wind manufacturing is low. Solar and wind are an enormous a part of the Texas electricity market; at one level on Thursday afternoon, the 2 contributed 27% of energy on the grid.

Changes have already been made: To spur crops to begin producing extra energy earlier when demand versus provide appears tight, the PUC instructed grid operators to maneuver up the set off for after they can enhance the value for electricity — which provides producers a monetary incentive to fulfill that demand.

The company additionally directed grid operators to scale back the utmost value for electricity from $9,000 per megawatt-hour to $5,000 per megawatt-hour.

During the 2021 storm, gas-fired energy crops had bother staying on-line as a result of they weren’t able to get enough natural gas when fuel turbines’ tools froze and manufacturing stopped. PUC additionally required energy turbines to winterize their tools to scale back failures throughout excessive chilly.

Commissioners spent Thursday going line by line by way of a doc that outlines the proposal, together with an intention to set a reliability commonplace for the state grid for the primary time — for instance, the grid may have a purpose to supply sufficient energy to fulfill demand on all however someday each 10 years.

Experts disagree on whether or not the efficiency credit will truly persuade energy corporations to construct extra pure fuel crops, that are dirtier than wind and photo voltaic vitality however will be turned on at any time. Some say new crops can be constructed anyway. Others say corporations can merely use the credit to earn more money from their current crops with out constructing extra.

Michele Richmond, government director of Texas Competitive Power Advocates, wrote in her feedback to the fee that the group’s members had been “ready to bring more than 4,500 [megawatts] of additional generation” to the state grid if the brand new system had been adopted. That could be sufficient to energy 900,000 properties. The group’s members embody Calpine, Luminant and NRG.

If the PUC doesn’t change the market, there received’t be sufficient purpose to put money into constructing new energy technology services and hold working current services, she wrote.

The Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club was amongst teams that requested the PUC to spend extra time contemplating whether or not the brand new credit are one of the best answer “before making fundamental changes to our market that would increase costs to consumers,” as Conservation Director Cyrus Reed wrote.

The unbiased market monitor, Potomac Economics, which is paid by the PUC to look at the market for manipulation and search for potential enhancements, doesn’t assist the thought. The group believes sufficient corrections have been made already to ensure the grid is dependable.

Still others, similar to Alison Silverstein, a former senior adviser on the PUC and the Texas Public Power Association, which is made up of municipal-owned utilities, cautioned that there wasn’t sufficient dependable information and evaluation in regards to the proposed credit to make such a big determination.

The grid’s reliability should enhance, Silverstein wrote to the PUC, however “we cannot do so at any cost, and we cannot do so using poorly understood, poorly-analyzed, or unproven market mechanisms to address unclear problem definitions and goals.”

Silverstein added: “If the commission makes a bad decision on … market reform due to haste, erroneous problem definition, sloppy analysis or misguided rationalizations, all Texans will bear the consequences for years through higher electric costs, lower reliability, and a slower economy, and millions of lower income Texans will suffer degraded health and comfort as they sacrifice to pay their electric bills.”

Commissioners voted unanimously to approve it. Grid operators stated the plan will take at the least two years to implement.

Disclosure: Calpine, Texas Competitive Power Advocates (TCPA) and Texas Public Power Association have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Financial supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Find a whole list of them here.