Oscar Pistorius and the Valentine’s killing of Reeva Steenkamp. What happened that night?

CAPE TOWN – Here’s what to learn about the evening South African Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius shot his female friend Reeva Steenkamp greater than a decade in the past in a Valentine’s Day killing that jolted the global and shattered the symbol of a sports activities celebrity.

Pistorius, a world-famous double-amputee sprinter who competed on carbon-fiber blades at the 2012 London Olympics, used to be released on parole Friday having served just about 9 years in jail for homicide.

He has all the time maintained he shot Steenkamp in a sad mistake in the predawn hours of Feb. 14, 2013, pondering she used to be a perilous intruder in his house in the South African capital, Pretoria. Prosecutors stated he killed Steenkamp, a 29-year-old fashion and truth TV megastar, deliberately throughout a late-night argument and then made up the intruder tale.

A pass judgement on initially accepted Pistorius’ story however South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal overturned a lesser manslaughter conviction in opposition to him after an attraction via prosecutors and discovered him in charge of homicide.

FOUR SHOTS

Pistorius didn’t deny that he shot 4 occasions via a locked bathroom cubicle door in his house along with his authorized 9 mm pistol, hitting Steenkamp in the head, arm and hip. But the reason why for Pistorius opening hearth shaped the central phase of his dramatic 2014 homicide trial, which lasted seven months and used to be broadcast reside throughout the global.

He testified that he heard a noise in the rest room in the heart of the evening and believed there used to be an outsider in his house. He stated he grabbed his gun from below the mattress the place he have been slumbering subsequent to Steenkamp and went to the rest room.

When he heard a noise from the cubicle, he fired via the door in what he stated he concept used to be self-defense. Steenkamp used to be hit on the different facet of the door.

PISTORIUS’ STORY

Pistorius’ tale used to be attacked via prosecutors, who requested how he didn’t first take a look at on the place Steenkamp used to be if he used to be so fascinated by a perilous intruder. They stated he even needed to stroll previous Steenkamp’s facet of the mattress to get to the rest room.

Pistorius stated he had woken up and had long gone out onto a balcony to retrieve a fan when he heard the noise from the rest room and used to be scared and panicked. He stated he rushed to get his gun and presumed Steenkamp used to be nonetheless in mattress.

Once he noticed Steenkamp used to be now not in mattress after the taking pictures, he discovered she could be the particular person in the bathroom, he testified. Pistorius stated he needed to spoil down the locked bathroom door with a cricket bat in a useless effort to save lots of her.

PROSTHETIC LEGS ON OR NOT?

Prosecutors alleged at the get started of the trial that Pistorius had taken the time to place on his prosthetic legs earlier than taking pictures Steenkamp. They stated it confirmed premeditation and he shouldn’t have achieved that if he used to be reacting abruptly to what he concept used to be a perilous intruder.

Pistorius’ protection attorneys confirmed the perspective of bullet holes in the bathroom door — which used to be introduced into court docket as an showcase — proved he fired the photographs whilst status on his stumps and prosecutors later conceded Pistorius did hearth the fatal photographs whilst he didn’t have his prosthetic legs on. Pistorius’ attorneys even had him stroll round the court with out his prosthetic legs, hoping to turn he used to be risky and susceptible with out them and how it could give an explanation for his panicked response to a conceivable risk in his house.

THE FIGHT

The foundation of the prosecution’s case used to be that the couple, who had handiest been relationship for a couple of months, had a late-night argument and Steenkamp fled to the rest room in worry of an indignant Pistorius. Neighbors testified that they heard shouting and screams coming from Pistorius’ villa round 3 a.m. earlier than loud bangs. Prosecutors stated it confirmed the couple had been arguing earlier than the gunshots.

Pistorius’ attorneys stated the screams got here from him after he discovered what he had achieved, and the bangs had been him hitting the door with the cricket bat to get to Steenkamp. The supervisor of the gated neighborhood the place Pistorius lived and his daughter had been the first other people on the scene after the taking pictures. The supervisor testified Pistorius used to be crying, screaming and praying whilst sporting Steenkamp’s bloodied frame down the stairs after they arrived.

THE FINAL VERDICT

The Supreme Court of Appeal in the end convicted Pistorius of homicide below a particular South African prison theory as a result of he acted with such recklessness when he shot via the door and must have recognized any individual would were killed with out justification. It is analogous to a third-degree homicide conviction and Pistorius used to be sentenced to 13 years and 5 months in jail.

But the ultimate verdict didn’t definitively say if Pistorius knew he used to be taking pictures in particular at Steenkamp and supposed to kill her and that question — the very middle of the case — might by no means be absolutely responded.

___

More AP protection of Oscar Pistorius: https://apnews.com/hub/oscar-pistorius