[This article was originally delivered to subscribers of our Education Watch newsletter. Sign up now to receive Education Watch directly in your inbox.]
A excessive school senior says Harding Charter Preparatory High School denied her the chance to take school courses subsequent semester via concurrent enrollment. School leaders say she didn’t ask in time, and including school courses to her schedule now might jeopardize her skill to graduate.
The Harding Independence school board denied her attraction Monday. So the coed, whose identify is Anne Daniel in accordance to public paperwork, emailed members of the state Board of Education, who mentioned her dilemma at its assembly Thursday.
Under state regulation, colleges can’t prohibit a scholar who meets the necessities for concurrent enrollment from taking part. One of the necessities is that college students have a signed type from the school district no later than the spring of their senior yr.
But Harding’s coverage says seniors should get the letter from their principal within the spring of their junior yr. That’s as a result of Harding (which routinely ranks among the many state’s finest colleges) requires 28 credit for commencement, above the state minimal of 23.
“There is no wiggle room for errors,” superintendent Steven Stefanick advised the state board, explaining that if college students and employees can plan forward for concurrent enrollment, they’ll guarantee college students meet the commencement necessities, too.
Other college students have requested concurrent enrollment previous the deadline, they usually had been denied, so it might be unfair to not observe the district’s coverage, Stefanick wrote to the coed on Oct. 26.
Daniel had advised him her monetary scenario has modified since her junior yr and even one semester of concurrent enrollment might save her 1000’s in tuition. “I love and appreciate my classes at Harding, however, I need to act in my best interest for financial stability in the future,” she wrote.
Though state board members didn’t take motion Thursday, their feedback leaned towards urgent the school to acquiesce.
“Is there some exception to this?” board member Sarah Lepak requested. “If you have people who didn’t meet the deadline junior year?”
“This makes no sense. You’re telling them what’s best for them,” board member Brian Bobek stated. The board is predicted to revisit the difficulty at its subsequent assembly.
Have a remark or a narrative tip? I’d love to hear from you by way of email or direct message.
— Jennifer Palmer
publish credit score to Source link