Sunday, May 26, 2024

Legal fight expected after New Mexico governor suspends the right to carry guns in public



New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s emergency order postponing the right to carry firearms in public in and round Albuquerque will spur a prison fight however may additionally elevate public consciousness about gun violence, prison students and advocates mentioned.

“It’s going to be challenged. But she’s trying to move the debate,” Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount’s Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said after Lujan Grisham announced Friday that she was temporarily suspending the right to carry firearms in her state’s largest city and surrounding Bernalillo County.

- Advertisement -

The 30-day suspension, enacted as an emergency public health measure, applies in most public places, from city sidewalks to urban recreational parks.

“No person, other than a law enforcement officer or licensed security officer, shall possess a firearm … either openly or concealed,” the governor’s order states.

“Politically, a lot of people will react favorably,” Levinson predicted during a telephone interview late Friday with The Associated Press. “But she’s bumping up against the Second Amendment, no doubt about it. And we have a very conservative Supreme Court that is poised to expand Second Amendment rights.”

- Advertisement -

Miranda Viscoli, co-president of New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence, applauded the governor’s order.

“If it makes it so that people think twice about using a gun to solve a personal dispute, it makes them think twice that they don’t want to go to jail,” Viscoli mentioned, “then it will work.”

The best Republican in the New Mexico Senate, Greg Baca of Belen, denounced Lujan Grisham’s order as an infringement on the gun rights of law-abiding voters. Dan Lewis, who serves on the nonpartisan Albuquerque City Council, referred to as the order an unconstitutional edict.

- Advertisement -

The governor, a Democrat, mentioned she was once was once pressured to act following fresh shootings together with the demise this week of an 11-year-old boy outdoor a minor league baseball stadium and gunfire remaining month that killed a 5-year-old lady who was once asleep in a motor house. The governor additionally cited the taking pictures demise in August of a 13-year-old lady in Taos County.

“I welcome the debate and fight about how to make New Mexicans safer,” Lujan Grisham mentioned right through a news convention at which she was once flanked by way of police officers together with the district legal professional for the Albuquerque space.

Lujan Grisham mentioned state police can be answerable for imposing what quantity to civil violations sporting a high-quality of up to $5,000. Residents nonetheless can delivery guns to non-public places like a gun vary or gun retailer if the firearm is in a container or has a cause lock or mechanism making it unattainable to discharge.

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller and Police Chief Harold Medina mentioned town police gained’t implement the order, and Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen mentioned he was once uneasy about how gun house owners may reply.

“I am wary of placing my deputies in positions that could lead to civil liability conflicts,” Allen said, “as well as the potential risks posed by prohibiting law-abiding citizens from their constitutional right to self-defense.”

Keller, a Democrat, mentioned in a observation the town welcomes “significant answers and extra assets to fight crime in Albuquerque,” however mentioned town police had been “not responsible for enforcing the governor’s ban.”

Medina famous that Albuquerque police had made greater than 200 arrests of homicide suspects in the remaining two years.

“We know all too well what it means that an 11-year-old boy and a 5-year-old girl were tragically killed by indiscriminate gun violence,” the police leader mentioned. “We share in the pain.”

Police spokesman Gilbert Gallegos famous that imposing the order additionally may just put Albuquerque police in a troublesome place with a U.S. Department of Justice police reform settlement.

Lujan Grisham’s order requires per 30 days inspections of firearms sellers statewide to make sure that compliance with gun regulations and for the state Department of Health to bring together a record on gunshot sufferers at hospitals that comes with age, race, gender and ethnicity, along side the emblem and caliber of firearm concerned.

Levinson mentioned she was once no longer acutely aware of every other governor taking a step as restrictive as Lujan Grisham. But she pointed to an offer by way of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has to amend the U.S. Constitution to harden federal gun regulations.

“I don’t think it will be a political loss for (Lujan Grisham) to be overturned,” Levinson mentioned. “She can say she did everything she could but was stopped by the courts.

Jacob Charles, a law professor at Pepperdine Caruso School of Law who studies the Second Amendment, noted that the Supreme Court, in the June 2022 Bruen case, expanded the right of law-abiding Americans to carry guns in public for self-defense.

He said that ruling limits the ability of to take into account arguments about a compelling government interest like the gun violence that Lujan Grisham said prompted her order.

“What it means is that contemporary costs and benefits aren’t part of the analysis,” Charles mentioned.

___

Stern and Sonner reported from Reno, Nev. Associated Press writers Ken Ritter and Rio Yamat in Las Vegas, Morgan Lee in Santa Fe., N.M.; Terry Tang in Phoenix and Felicia Fonseca in Flagstaff, Arizona, contributed to this report. Stern is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America puts newshounds in native newsrooms throughout the nation to record on undercovered problems.

More articles

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest article