Lawsuits claim hair relaxer products contain cancerous chemicals

First came the study.  

Then, simply days later, got here the lawsuits.  

Last October, the National Cancer Institute launched a research that confirmed girls who often used chemical hair relaxers could have a better danger of growing uterine most cancers than girls who don’t use them. 

Within per week, a number of fits have been filed towards L’Oreal and different manufacturers and firms that manufacture and market chemical relaxers. Court paperwork launched this month report that there are at present greater than 55 lawsuits pending in courts throughout the nation.  

“We have thousands of cases in our office right now that we are currently investigating,” legal professional Aigner Kolom stated.  

Kolom is a principal with Alabama-based Beasley-Allen legislation agency and represents purchasers across the nation, together with many who’re hoping to file civil fits towards the producers of hair relaxer products.

The NCI’s study was launched on October 17. Researchers studied the associations between varied hair product use and charges of uterine most cancers in almost 34,000 girls over a greater than 10-year interval. The research centered on using perms, physique wave perms, dyes and chemical straighteners.   

The research states researchers didn’t discover a correlation between uterine most cancers circumstances and perms, physique wave perms or dyes. However, after figuring out 378 uterine most cancers circumstances, researchers reported discovering that “use of straightening products in the previous 12 months was associated with higher incident uterine cancer rates” with a stronger affiliation present in individuals who used them often (greater than 4 occasions per 12 months) in comparison with individuals who by no means use them.  

As a baseline, the research predicts that 1.64% of ladies who by no means use chemical straighteners will develop uterine most cancers by the age of 70. Based on their findings, researchers predict 4.05% of ladies who use the products often will develop uterine most cancers. Researchers predict that for each 42 girls who often (greater than 4 occasions per 12 months) used chemical hair straighteners, one extra uterine most cancers case could be anticipated. 

The research states that whereas earlier analysis has proven a relationship between these products and different kinds of hormone-related cancers like ovarian most cancers and breast most cancers, that is the primary analysis printed that focuses on uterine most cancers.  

The report states hair products are “a predominant exposure pathway to various EDCs.” EDC stands for endocrine disrupting chemicals.  

According to the analysis, “it has been hypothesized that synthetic estrogenic compounds such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) could contribute to uterine cancer risk because of their ability to alter hormonal actions.” 

The research doesn’t establish any particular hair relaxer manufacturers or corporations and even establish a particular chemical within the products, stating that extra analysis must be completed to “identify the chemical ingredients, which might result in the elevated rates.” 

Kolom has filed multiple lawsuits on behalf of her purchasers towards hair relaxer producers. 

“They all…we all…wanted straight hair,” Kolom stated. “I believe a number of these corporations are pushing this straight hair on us.” 

Kolom’s fits, together with others reviewed by WFAA, dedicate a number of pages to the historical past of Black hair in America and the way that historical past contributes to Black girls in search of products and providers to straighten their hair whereas showcasing a quantity of advertisements for the products that includes photographs of Black girls with straightened hair.

These lawsuits claim that many hair relaxers contain chemicals within the “fragrance” or “perfume” portion of the product, that are not listed as components.  

According to the FDA’s web site, “…underneath U.S. rules, perfume and taste components could be listed merely as “Fragrance” or “Flavor.” 

WFAA reached out to the FDA, asking whether or not it might conduct an investigation or assessment any of those products following the research.  

A consultant responded, “The FDA does not comment on possible, pending or ongoing litigation.” 

When WFAA clarified that the request was in regards to the products themselves, not the litigation involving the producers, the FDA maintained it doesn’t have an additional response. 

L’Oreal is the dad or mum firm behind manufacturers like SoftSheen Carson and Dark & Lovely. L’Oreal offered WFAA with this assertion:  

“We are confident in the safety of our products and believe the recent lawsuits filed against us have no legal merit. L’Oréal upholds the highest standards of safety for all its products. Our products are subject to a rigorous scientific evaluation of their safety by experts who also ensure that we follow strictly all regulations in every market in which we operate.”   

Earlier this month, a federal judicial panel dominated that each one hair relaxer circumstances will probably be consolidated to 1 court docket in what’s known as multidistrict litigation, or MDL. The court docket doc ordering the MDL said the aim of this transfer is to make the method extra environment friendly, since greater than 55 lawsuits have been filed on this situation throughout the nation. 

Companies like L’Oreal and Namaste Laboratories, the corporate that produces Olive Oil relaxers, filed court docket paperwork against consolidating the circumstances. 

In a submitting associated to the consolidation of the lawsuits, L’Oreal said “…there isn’t a allegation {that a} particular product made by (for instance) L’Oréal USA contained EDCs … and led to a specific plaintiff’s alleged situation. Instead, the actions refer usually to traces of products and don’t establish the chemical or chemicals contained in these products which may enhance the danger of the medical circumstances alleged.” 

In the same court docket submitting, Namaste wrote: “Not surprisingly, the researchers concluded that additional studies are needed for a number of reasons, including to understand the effect of various potential confounding factors, to confirm the researchers’ findings in different populations, and to identify chemical ingredients.” 

Dallas legal professional Larry Taylor Junior says the variety of filed circumstances continues to develop.

 “I’ve done this for a number of years, and I’m still wrestling emotionally with these clients and what they have to go through because of corporate irresponsibility,” Taylor stated. 

The circumstances on this situation have been assigned to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which is in Chicago. Judge Mary Rowland will oversee the proceedings. 

Attorneys on each side are ready for an order from Judge Rowland laying out how they’re to proceed on this case.

Have a tip? Let us know or e-mail us at [email protected]