Impeachment win doesn’t end Texas AG Ken Paxton’s legal troubles

After a 10-day trial, Texas senators on Saturday voted to acquit Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on allegations of bribery and corruption, clearing him to go back to his tasks because the state’s best legal professional.

But Paxton’s legal troubles don’t seem to be over.

He nonetheless faces state securities fraud fees, a case that has stretched out for 8 years and counting, beginning with an indictment simply months after he took workplace in 2015. The case has been behind schedule for years via pretrial disputes — together with a back-and-forth fight over the trial venue that noticed it moved to Houston from Collin County, which Paxton represented as a state lawmaker.

And Paxton has been below investigation via the FBI since October 2020, despite the fact that no fees had been filed.

Federal investigators started their investigation after a number of best Paxton deputies went to the FBI and alleged the legal professional common had dedicated crimes, together with bribery, whilst looking to lend a hand his pal and political donor, Austin actual property developer Nate Paul. Justice Department prosecutors who normally take care of high-profile public corruption instances took over the case in February.

Federal regulation professionals and previous prosecutors contacted via The Texas Tribune say the impeachment consequence isn’t more likely to adjust the process Paxton’s securities fraud case. As some distance because the FBI investigation, they mentioned, witness testimony within the impeachment hearings may just lend a hand federal officers assessment the strengths and weaknesses in their case.

In the state case, Paxton faces two counts of securities fraud, a first-degree legal that carries a punishment of as much as 99 years in jail, stemming from his 2011 efforts to solicit traders in Servergy Inc. with out disclosing that the McKinney tech corporate used to be paying him to advertise its inventory. Paxton additionally faces one rely of failing to check in with state securities regulators, a third-degree legal with a most punishment of 10 years in jail.

Speaking to journalists after Saturday’s Senate vote, Paxton legal professional Dan Cogdell known as for the securities fraud case to be disregarded, pronouncing it and the impeachment trial have been each “B.S.”

“That case, like this one, should have never been brought,” he mentioned. “They must brush aside it. And in the event that they don’t brush aside it, we can check out them and beat them there identical to we beat them right here.”

Sandra Guerra Thompson, a former New York City prosecutor who teaches prison regulation on the University of Houston Law Center, mentioned Paxton’s victory within the impeachment trial most likely manner his state prison case will proceed on its provide trajectory.

“The same motivation to try to delay [the case] would continue from his perspective, and the prosecutors would have the same motivations to move forward,” she mentioned. “It’s very perilous for a public official to have charges like that against them. Because even if you get them reduced to a misdemeanor, they’re still crimes of moral turpitude. So it’s problematic.”

A conviction, she mentioned, would have made a plea settlement much more likely as a result of prosecutors would have much less urgency to take the case to trial so as to take away him from workplace.

Last month in a Houston court docket earlier than a brand new pass judgement on, protection attorneys and prosecutors agreed to go back Oct. 6 to care for pending motions and set a tribulation date.

“At some point, it has to come to an end,” particular prosecutor Brian Wice instructed journalists in a while. “I think today was the first step in a journey of a thousand miles to make sure that justice ultimately comes to be.”

Susan Klein, a former federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and lately the Alice McKean Young Regents Chair in Law on the University of Texas School of Law, mentioned she doesn’t see the impeachment trial having an affect at the state prison case.

“I don’t see how this impeachment has any effects on any of the criminal cases, to be frank, he’s not testifying (in the impeachment), which is smart,” she mentioned.

Regardless of the impeachment end result, she mentioned, if Paxton can proceed dragging out the state prison case, “I think that is better for him” as a result of he may just then make a controversy that his proper to a rapid trial used to be violated.

“You can’t have a trial 10 or 12 years after the event,” she mentioned. “That’s why they have statute of limitations. Witnesses forget things, and the defendant has a right to a trial.”

In the federal case, the FBI used to be indubitably following the testimony on the state Capitol because the House impeachment managers known as quite a lot of witnesses, together with former Paxton deputies-turned-whistleblowers, mentioned Michael Bromwich, senior recommend at Washington D.C.-based Steptoe regulation company and a former Justice Department inspector common.

Bromwich represented former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe all the way through the Trump-Russia investigation and represented Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor who alleged she used to be sexually assaulted via Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. He mentioned no person is aware of what proof the FBI and Justice Department have assembled in opposition to Paxton, and proof introduced within the impeachment trial may just give them extra ammunition for his or her case.

It’s additionally a chance to judge possible witnesses, he added, “as a result of they have got now observed, amongst different issues, how a few of their key witnesses will if truth be told carry out in handing over their testimony, whether or not they come throughout as credible, whether or not they come throughout as biased or prejudiced in opposition to Attorney General Paxton.

“So I think that it could possibly affect how strong they think their criminal case would be,” he mentioned.

According to the Associated Press, federal prosecutors and a grand jury heard testimony from witnesses together with Drew Wicker, who served as Paxton’s former private aide and testified all the way through the impeachment trial that he heard Paxton and a contractor talk about the price of proposed adjustments to the renovations at Paxton’s Austin house.

Wicker testified that he grew an increasing number of uneasy with Paxton’s habits in 2020 — specifically along with his shut courting with Paul.

Robert Downen contributed to this tale.

The Texas Tribune Festival is sort of right here! Join us Sept. 21-23 in downtown Austin for 125+ unforgettable conversations that includes just about 300 audio system. Be there for Texas’ largest politics and coverage tournament while you buy your tickets today.