Baltimore officers stated Wednesday that they’ve filed a movement to vacate the conviction of Adnan Syed, the subject of the favored podcast “Serial” who was convicted in February 2000 for killing his ex-girlfriend. Officials on Wednesday requested one other trial and stated new proof — together with the existence of two potential different suspects — casts doubt on Syed’s prior conviction.
Syed was discovered responsible in 1999 of killing 17-year-old Hae Min Lee and was sentenced to life in jail plus 30 years.
“Since the inception of my administration, my prosecutors have been sworn to not only aggressively advocate on behalf of the victims of crime, but in the pursuit of justice, — when the evidence exists— to correct the wrongs of the past where doubt is evident,” Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby stated in an announcement asserting the choice.
“For that reason, after a nearly year-long investigation reviewing the facts of this case, Syed deserves a new trial where he is adequately represented and the latest evidence can be presented,” Mosby added.
Mosby and Sentencing Review Unit Chief Becky Feldman stated within the assertion that the choice is the consequence of an almost year-long investigation that exposed beforehand undisclosed information about two potential alternate suspects and highlighted the unreliability of mobile phone tower knowledge that had been utilized in his authentic trial.
One of the potential suspects allegedly stated that “he would make her [Ms. Lee] disappear. He would kill her,” in accordance to the assertion. The different individual “relayed information that can be viewed as a motive for that same suspect to harm the victim,” the assertion added.
The assertion additionally stated Lee’s automotive was situated “directly behind the house of one of the suspect’s family members.” Neither of the potential suspects had been named.
“This information about the threat and motives to harm could have provided a basis for the defense and was not disclosed to the trial nor the post-conviction defense counsel,” the assertion stated.
The assertion emphasised that this doesn’t imply prosecutors have decided that Syed is harmless — however stated that “considering the totality of the circumstances, the State lacks confidence in the integrity of the conviction.”
This is a growing story. It shall be up to date.
story by The Texas Tribune Source link