Army commanders’ use of pretrial confinement is widely uneven

This story contains descriptions of sexual assault and bodily violence.

This article is co-published with ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to obtain tales like this one in your inbox as quickly as they’re revealed.

Also, sign up for The Brief, our day by day publication that retains readers up to the mark on probably the most important Texas news.

---

If you or somebody you recognize has been sexually assaulted, you’ll be able to obtain confidential assist by calling the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network’s 24/7 toll-free assist line at 800-656-4673 or visiting its website. You will be linked to a hotline employees member in your space or to the Department of Defense’s Safe Helpline.

---

Christian Alvarado started to sort as he sat alone in an interrogation room at Fort Bliss, a sprawling Army publish in El Paso. He’d spent most of the earlier seven hours hooked as much as a polygraph, answering a army investigator’s questions on an allegation that he’d sexually assaulted a fellow soldier.

His story had modified a number of occasions in the course of the interview in late July 2020. The investigator informed Alvarado he’d already failed two polygraph checks, then left the room in order that the younger soldier might sort up his account in a sworn assertion. With his fingers on the keyboard, Alvarado started describing the night time in December 2019 that he spent within the barracks with a feminine soldier he’d met that day.

“She was drunk and so was I,” Alvarado, an Army personal firstclass, typed on the investigator’s pc. “We had sex, but she passed out.”

He wrote that he’d lied in regards to the encounter being consensual in earlier interviews with investigators as a result of he needed to guard his Army profession.

When Alvarado was executed together with his written admission, the army investigator walked again within the room. He requested Alvarado why he continued to have intercourse with the girl after she handed out. “I was in the moment,” the 20-year-old soldier replied.

The investigator then requested Alvarado about one other allegation in opposition to him. An Army chaplain’s assistant had accused him of sexually assaulting her in May 2020 after a home social gathering. Sex along with her was “wrong due to how intoxicated she was,” Alvarado stated, however he wouldn’t comply with a sworn assertion in regards to the second allegation as a result of it will simply be “icing on the cake.”

Alvarado informed the investigator that he’d had intercourse with 42 ladies previously 4 years, a few quarter of whom had been intoxicated on the time. His sexual experiences had turn out to be boring they usually blurred collectively, he stated, to the purpose that he struggled to recollect particular particulars about his companions.

At the tip of the daylong interrogation, Alvarado’s commanders didn’t place him in detention or underneath any restrictions past the orders he had already acquired to remain a minimum of 100 ft away from the 2 ladies who had accused him of assault, based on information. He was free to go away.

A month later, he sexually assaulted one other girl.

Had Alvarado’s case been dealt with by civilians and never the army, his written admission might have been sufficient proof to shortly problem an arrest warrant, based on two legal professionals who beforehand labored for the El Paso County district legal professional’s workplace.

“I would have felt comfortable charging at that point,” stated Penny Hamilton, who led the Rape and Child Abuse Unit on the district legal professional’s workplace and later served as an El Paso County Justice of the Peace choose. “When you have the offender admitting the sexual act took place and you have the offender admitting that the alleged victim couldn’t have consented because she was passed out, then you have the elements” of a legal cost.

In Texas’ civilian system, an individual charged with sexual assault goes earlier than a Justice of the Peace choose, who’d set a bail quantity that consultants stated might simply be within the tens of hundreds of {dollars}. Civilian magistrates and judges use bail to make sure suspects present up at trial. Suspects are launched provided that they’ll pay the bond.

The army justice system has no bail. Many selections about who ought to be detained for critical crimes earlier than trial are made not by judges however by commanders, who usually are not required to be skilled legal professionals.

Recent congressional reforms modified the system, which has lengthy drawn criticism for the intensive discretion commanders wield. While the revisions stripped some of their authority, commanders proceed to manage numerous features of the judicial course of, together with deciding whether or not service members accused of crimes ought to be detained whereas awaiting trial, a course of referred to as pretrial confinement.

A ProPublica and Texas Tribune investigation into how commanders within the Army, the nation’s largest army department, use pretrial confinement revealed a system that treats troopers erratically and attracts little exterior scrutiny. Over the approaching months, ProPublica and the Tribune will discover how army justice operates, usually in vastly other ways than the civilian system.

The news organizations obtained knowledge from the Army on almost 8,400 courts-martial over the previous decade underneath the Freedom of Information Act. The ensuing evaluation, the first-of-its-kind, confirmed that troopers accused of sexual assault are lower than half as prone to be positioned in pretrial confinement than these accused of offenses like drug use and distribution, disobeying an officer or housebreaking.

The evaluation confirmed that, on common, troopers needed to face a minimum of eight counts of sexual offenses earlier than they had been positioned in pretrial confinement as usually as troopers charged with drug or housebreaking crimes.

That disparity has grown previously 5 years. The fee of pretrial confinement greater than doubled in instances involving drug offenses, larceny and disobeying a superior commissioned officer, nevertheless it remained roughly the identical for sexual assault instances like Alvarado’s, the evaluation discovered.

For occasion, the Army opted in opposition to pretrial confinement for a employees sergeant who was accused of raping the spouse of a soldier in his command at Fort Bliss, whereas at one other publish a 19-year-old Texas girl was positioned in detention for greater than three months for utilizing medicine and mouthing off to commanders.

“Justice that’s arbitrary is not justice,” Col. Don Christensen, a former chief prosecutor for the Air Force, stated. “It shouldn’t come down to the whims of a particular commander.”

Army officers defended the system. They stated that troopers accused of violent offenses aren’t essentially extra prone to get pretrial confinement. “The nature of the offense is one factor to consider in a decision to put someone in pretrial confinement, but it is not the sole factor,” stated Lt. Col. Brian Ok. Carr, chief of the operations department on the Office of the Judge Advocate General’s Criminal Law Division, in an electronic mail. Characteristics of particular person troopers and their willingness to comply with orders are additionally necessary elements, Carr stated.

He stated that, underneath army rules, commanders should first resolve whether or not there’s good motive to imagine {that a} soldier dedicated a criminal offense and is both prone to flee earlier than trial or interact in critical legal misconduct. Commanders have to contemplate if different restrictions, comparable to directing troopers to stay in army housing or requiring common check-ins with superiors, are adequate to maintain them out of hassle. They must also weigh a soldier’s army service report, character, psychological situation and any earlier misconduct.

In March 2020, months earlier than Alvarado was interviewed in regards to the sexual assault allegations, commanders reprimanded him after El Paso police arrested him for firing an AR-15 exterior of his girlfriend’s condominium. Alvarado informed police on the time that he was trying to scare off a pack of coyotes. An El Paso County warrant within the case stays excellent.

Despite the reprimand and the preliminary sexual assault allegations, former Fort Bliss spokesperson Lt. Col. Allie Scott stated that the circumstances to justify putting Alvarado in pretrial confinement weren’t met. Scott, who just lately transferred to a different publish, declined to make clear. She stated Fort Bliss wouldn’t touch upon inside deliberations.

Nearly a month after Alvarado walked out of the interrogation room at Fort Bliss, an Army captain decided there was possible trigger that he dedicated sexual assault, based on information obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune. In a letter to the news organizations, Alvarado would later say he was harmless however declined to reply particular questions.

The Army’s resolution, and the failure to shortly act on it, got here too late for Lee, a civilian and the third girl whom he would later be charged with sexually assaulting.

Lee, who agreed to go by her center identify for this story, nonetheless relives the second in late August when Alvarado assaulted her in her front room. He pinned her down on her sofa and wrapped his hand round her throat whereas her two kids slept throughout the home.

She remembers calling a good friend and crying weeks later when she realized from army investigators that Alvarado had beforehand been accused of sexual assault.

“If something had been done sooner, he would have never gotten the chance to hurt me,” Lee stated.

A justice system led by army commanders

The U.S. army justice system dates again to the American Revolution. Yet the way in which through which the system works and the way it diverges from the civilian authorized course of is unknown to many Americans. (About 8% of adults within the U.S. presently serve or have served within the active-duty and reserve army forces.)

The system was created to assist commanders preserve their combating forces in line. So, initially, courts dealt with solely military-specific offenses like desertion or dereliction of obligation.

“George Washington needed a means to discipline his troops,” stated Rachel E. VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former Air Force choose advocate, which is a army legal professional. “It was very much a commander’s tool.”

Bail was by no means half of the army system as a result of service members had been usually stationed in fortresses or distant, frontier garrisons, the place commanders managed their actions, stated Joshua Kastenberg, a professor on the University of New Mexico School of Law and former Air Force choose advocate.

Civilian crimes weren’t tried at court-martial till the American Civil War, after which solely as a strategy to prosecute Union troopers who had been accused of crimes in Confederate states, Kastenberg stated.

For many years after, the army might deal with civilian offenses solely throughout occasions of conflict.

Then the primary and second world wars uncovered a better quantity of enlisted women and men to a justice system that was dramatically totally different from the civilian one. For instance, the folks representing them at trial weren’t required to be skilled legal professionals.

In an effort to convey the army extra in step with civilian court docket practices, Congress developed the Uniform Code of Military Justice in 1950. This was a significant turning level, giving the army — and, in flip, commanders — jurisdiction over civilian offenses like homicide and sexual assault, not simply throughout wars however in occasions of peace, Kastenberg stated.

In the years since, the army pushed again in opposition to limiting commanders’ management. Some army authorized consultants interviewed by ProPublica and the Tribune preserve pretrial confinement is superior to the civilian bail system as a result of a suspect’s freedom has nothing to do with their capacity to pay. Criminal justice consultants who oppose bail argue that it criminalizes poverty and penalizes people of color.

Critics of the army justice system say giving commanders authority over who will get detained reinforces an ongoing downside within the army. Commanders are an accused individual’s supervisor and have little expertise or coaching to make consequential authorized selections.

Commanders “have convinced themselves that they have some special insight shared by no others that makes them solely qualified to make prosecution decisions and control the justice system,” stated Christensen, now president of the nonprofit Protect Our Defenders, a corporation that promotes army justice reform.

The most up-to-date congressional push to defend the courts-martial course of from commanders’ affect adopted the 2020 murder of Vanessa Guillén, an Army specialist who was sexually harassed by a supervisor after which allegedly killed by one other soldier at Fort Hood.

Guillén’s demise helped construct momentum for a long-standing effort by some lawmakers to dramatically scale back commanders’ position within the army justice system. A invoice launched by U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, proposed stripping commanders of the facility to resolve whether or not to prosecute critical offenses and giving that authority to army legal professionals.

The army brass pushed again. To take away commanders “from prosecution decisions, process, and accountability may have an adverse effect on readiness, mission accomplishment, good order and discipline, unit cohesion, trust, and loyalty between commanders and those they lead,” Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote in a May 2021 letter to Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee.

In the tip, Congress authorized a compromise final yr that created a brand new workplace of army attorneys with the facility to prosecute instances associated to some critical crimes comparable to sexual assault, home violence, homicide and kidnapping.

Commanders retained prosecutorial management over different offenses, like theft, assault and distribution of managed substances.

Under the brand new legislation, commanders additionally held on to authority over different components of the judicial course of, together with pretrial confinement. They can seek the advice of army attorneys with authorized questions, however they don’t seem to be required to comply with that recommendation. And whereas a Justice of the Peace choose evaluations instances through which an individual is positioned in pretrial confinement, there is no such evaluation when commanders decide in opposition to detaining troopers accused of crimes.

A harmful individual

To perceive the way in which that commanders’ discretion works in apply, think about the case of Randall S. Hughes, a Fort Bliss Army employees sergeant who was accused of raping the spouse of one of his troopers at a Super Bowl social gathering in 2017.

The girl informed ProPublica and the Tribune she repeatedly requested that the Army place Hughes in pretrial confinement after it started an investigation. Hughes’ commanders didn’t. They eventually decided against pursuing the case, citing proof and recommendation from army counsel.

Hughes later moved to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey the place, in May 2020, his 16-year-old daughter informed army investigators that he had sexually assaulted her two months earlier.

Again, he was not detained.

Hughes’ commanders in New Jersey as a substitute directed him to reside on publish and required him to test in by cellphone three times a day.

During the investigation into his daughter’s accusation, army legislation enforcement found allegations that years earlier Hughes sexually assaulted one ex-wife and raped one other. The latter incident occurred whereas he was already underneath investigation for the rape at Fort Bliss. They realized a 3rd ex-wife accused him of strangling her in 2015.

Hughes was once more not put into pretrial confinement.

Matt Leonard, an Army spokesperson, stated in an electronic mail that Hughes’ commanders “took appropriate action” to make sure the employees sergeant confirmed up at trial and did “not engage in further serious misconduct.” They additionally issued protecting orders for the victims.

In a March 2021 plea deal, Hughes admitted to a quantity of costs, together with raping the girl on the Super Bowl social gathering and one of his ex-wives. He additionally was convicted of “squeezing” one other ex-wife’s neck together with his palms. A choose sentenced him to nearly 14 years in jail and dishonorably discharged him. He didn’t plead responsible to sexually assaulting his daughter however admitted to utilizing indecent language along with her and pulling her by the hair.

Hughes’ legal professional didn’t reply to an electronic mail requesting remark.

Chayla Madsen, Hughes’ first ex-wife and the mom of the daughter who accused him of sexual assault, stated she agreed to the plea deal solely as a result of army attorneys stated it will pace up the judicial course of and be higher for the victims.

Madsen used to imagine the most secure place her daughter might be was on a army base. Now she has no religion in a system that did not take critical authorized motion in opposition to Hughes in 2017 when he was first accused of sexual assault.

“They had every reason to believe he is a dangerous person,” Madsen stated.

Serial offenses

Fort Bliss, the place Hughes was first accused of sexual assault, makes use of pretrial confinement considerably much less usually than the overwhelming majority of Army posts, making use of it at a fee of roughly 6% for instances with out sexual offenses and 5% for sexual assault instances, based on the news organizations’ evaluation.

Just as they’d executed with Hughes, Fort Bliss commanders equally determined at numerous junctures to not detain Alvarado.

They had one other alternative two weeks after he assaulted Lee.

Military investigators guided the 30-year-old mom, who had a quick relationship with Alvarado earlier than the assault, to contact him and see if he would acknowledge what occurred on the night time of Aug. 26, 2020, when he requested to return over to her home to speak.

While sitting in a room with investigators, Lee texted Alvarado and requested him to clarify why he didn’t cease when she informed him to.

He apologized.

After the admission, the Army ordered that Alvarado keep 100 ft away from Lee. He additionally had different restrictions, together with a requirement that he test in with commanders seven occasions a day in individual or by cellphone, textual content or video name.

Scott, the Fort Bliss spokesperson, stated commanders decided Alvarado’s restrictions “based on the information available to them at the time.”

But six attorneys and army legislation consultants expressed shock that commanders nonetheless didn’t order him into pretrial confinement.

“He’s under investigation for two sexual assaults, he’s been told to leave these people alone and then we have credible evidence that he’s committed another sexual assault,” stated Geoffrey S. Corn, a former Army officer and professor on the South Texas College of Law in Houston. “That’s enough to prove to me two things: No. 1, he’s dangerous and, No. 2, he might be a flight risk because he’s not getting the message he has to behave.”

One night time, nearly a month after the textual content trade, Lee referred to as 911 when her 10-year-old son informed her that Alvarado had tapped on his bed room window and stated hey, based on a police report and an interview with Lee. Military police arrived shortly however couldn’t find anybody. Had Alvarado been there, he would have been in violation of the protecting order that required him to keep away from Lee.

Scott stated neither Fort Bliss investigators nor Alvarado’s commanders knew of the declare as a result of army police recordsdata didn’t point out his identify. Records obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune present that Lee shared Alvarado’s identify and the truth that she had a protecting order in opposition to him with a 911 dispatcher.

In late October, two months after Lee was assaulted, the Army formally charged Alvarado with three counts of sexual assault, in addition to with strangling Lee and mendacity to investigators. Still, he was not detained.

By the tip of December, Alvarado was in hassle once more.

He was arrested for driving drunk throughout a visit to Arizona, the place his household lives. Fort Bliss officers stated they weren’t conscious of the arrest as a result of neither Alvarado nor the Scottsdale Police Department notified the publish.

Alvarado then missed a number of required check-ins with commanders. Such failures might set off pretrial confinement. They didn’t. After a month of missed check-ins, Alvarado’s firm commander elevated how usually he needed to contact his superiors and required him to write down a 1,000-word essay on “the importance of Army leaders ensuring the safety and well-being of their Soldiers.”

“How long do we need to let a serial predator continue to violate orders and harm people?” stated Franklin Rosenblatt, a legislation professor who beforehand served as a Fort Bliss choose advocate from 2010 to 2012.

Different remedy

Army officers say that pretrial confinement ought to be a final resort as a result of it detains troopers earlier than they’ve been convicted of a criminal offense. But Pvt. Olivia Ochoa’s expertise exhibits how aggressive Army commanders will be even in instances with extra minor infractions.

A San Antonio native, Ochoa turned keen on army intelligence jobs after assembly a recruiter her senior yr of highschool. She joined the Army as a promising soldier in August 2020 shortly after graduating and was promoted in rank, based on her recruiter.

The 19-year-old soldier quickly started to get in hassle. Months into her Army profession, Ochoa was reprimanded for sexual harassment and making a hostile work surroundings after she and one other soldier had been accused of slapping one another’s butts, interior thighs and continuously flirting throughout formation in Fort Huachuca, Arizona.

The incident, which Ochoa denies, was the primary in a sequence of run-ins along with her drill sergeants, starting from not carrying “the appropriate amount of water” in her water bottle to extra critical points like underage ingesting and consuming a THC edible.

“Once I knew I was gonna get in trouble no matter how much I tried, I completely stopped trying,” Ochoa stated.

By May 2021, one of Ochoa’s drill sergeants recommended that she be released from the Army.

While ready to be discharged, Ochoa stated, she was sexually assaulted by one other soldier at an off-post resort. She initially fearful that if she filed a report, the army would delay her launch, however after her psychological well being started deteriorating, she determined to report the assault.

In July, Ochoa was caught with psychedelic mushrooms and what investigators believed to be a vape pen with THC. The Army charged her with drug possession and use.

Her commander positioned her underneath restrictions that, amongst different issues, allowed her to visit only the few buildings on post where she slept, ate and worked out.

Two days later, Ochoa bought in hassle for refusing her superiors’ order to return to mattress after she left her room to test on a good friend who was being positioned in confinement. That was sufficient for commanders to position her in pretrial confinement the subsequent day.

A army Justice of the Peace ordered Ochoa’s launch a few week later, figuring out confinement was “not warranted” as a result of she had not damaged her restrictions.

Her freedom was short-lived.

In the week following her launch, Ochoa’s commander once more positioned her in pretrial confinement after she was caught two days in a row at shops she had been barred from visiting, as soon as making an attempt to purchase cough medication she stated she deliberate to take to get excessive.

Although the Army’s case centered on drug use and possession, Ochoa was in the end put in pretrial confinement each occasions for violating superior officers’ orders. Her commanders added seven new counts of disobeying and disrespecting superiors onto her drug case for causes that included refusing to return to her room and visiting the on-post shops.

Ochoa’s actions confirmed that she shouldn’t be within the Army, however her punishment was extreme, stated Rosenblatt, the legislation professor and former Army choose advocate. He stated her case is an instance of how pretrial confinement is utilized in “arbitrary” methods that may usually be fueled by a commander’s relationship with the soldier.

Commanders usually interpret drug use as jeopardizing the morale or security of the unit, whereas they have a tendency to view sexual assaults as a battle between two folks, stated Aniela Szymanski, a non-public legal professional and Marine Corps Reserve choose advocate.

“I think that’s going to take some time for commanders to grow into having the same knee-jerk reaction to sexual assault offenses as they do to drug offenses,” she stated.

Ochoa spent 103 days in pretrial confinement. She stopped consuming, barely slept and was dropping her hair and eyelashes.

In November, after her preliminary trial date was pushed again by two months, Ochoa accepted a plea deal. She was sentenced to time served. During the listening to, Ochoa realized Army officers had determined to not pursue her sexual assault case, figuring out that they might not set up possible trigger.

The resolution was a shock to Ochoa and her civilian lawyer, Sean Timmons, who stated investigators didn’t interview key witnesses in regards to the assault. Army officers later agreed to talk with extra folks, however they got here to the identical conclusion and closed the case this yr.

“I believe if she was a soldier who they actually liked and wanted to see have a productive career, they probably would have already taken steps to do this investigation properly,” Timmons, a former army legal professional, stated in an interview. “But because they don’t like her, they’re going to maltreat her and they’re going to do a half-assed job prosecuting him.”

A Fort Huachuca spokesperson stated the Army takes sexual assault allegations significantly and performed a radical and unbiased investigation into Ochoa’s case.

“Broken”

In March 2021, greater than seven months after Alvarado confessed throughout his interrogation, he was positioned in pretrial confinement.

By then, the allegations of sexual assault in opposition to him had drawn nationwide consideration. Asia Graham, the soldier who Alvarado acknowledged he sexually assaulted whereas she was unconscious, died at age 19 after unintentionally overdosing on medicine. Before her demise, Graham had written a letter to her mom, Nicole Graham, in regards to the ache she felt as a result of the Army had did not take motion in opposition to Alvarado.

The publicity round Graham’s case brought about two extra ladies to come forward in an interview with the cable news network NewsNation and accuse Alvarado of assaulting them years earlier in Arizona. The ladies had not beforehand reported the incidents.

Commanders’ repeated selections in opposition to pretrial confinement, which gave Alvarado the chance to assault Lee, didn’t draw public consideration. But Alvarado’s civilian protection legal professional final yr, Sherry Bunn, informed ProPublica and the Tribune that she believed Army leaders had been merely reacting to “the press and publicity and the political nature” of Graham’s and Guillén’s deaths after they determined to restrict him. Army officers say he was put in pretrial confinement as a result of of the extra allegations.

Nicole Graham stated her daughter would possibly nonetheless be alive had commanders positioned Alvarado in detention earlier. That might need satisfied her daughter, who was haunted by the assault, that the Army was taking the case significantly, the mom stated.

“I think she would have felt maybe stronger in her recovery and not self-medicated,” she stated.

Nicole Graham bought the prospect to face Alvarado on June 18, 2021, when a army choose discovered him responsible of sexually assaulting her daughter and Lee, of strangling Lee and of mendacity to investigators. The choose acquitted him of all different costs, together with the sexual assault of the chaplain’s assistant. After the choose’s ruling, Nicole Graham learn a press release from the stand about Asia: “The military has let her down.”

The choose sentenced Alvarado to 18 years and three months in a army jail and a dishonorable discharge from the Army. He bought credit score for the time he spent in pretrial confinement forward of his trial: 108 days, 5 days greater than Ochoa.

Because of the dishonorable discharge and the size of his sentence, Alvarado’s case is underneath automated attraction. A choice is nonetheless pending. He stays in custody.

The undeniable fact that Alvarado is behind bars offers Lee little consolation. The assault modified her.

She nonetheless has nightmares in regards to the presence of somebody in her house, strolling up the steps to her bed room and beating on the door.

Life was not good earlier than the assault. She’d misplaced a being pregnant earlier than having her two kids. Two marriages to Army troopers ended. But she nonetheless had a life. She used to get pleasure from socializing, inviting associates over for sport nights or going out round city.

Now, she stays house most of the time.

She’s thought of reducing her lengthy hair, as a result of attackers can seize you by the hair.

She not likes to be touched, particularly on her face. Even her younger daughter loving on her can generally trigger her to panic.

“I’m a little more broken than I used to be.”

---

Help The Texas Tribune and ProPublica report on the army justice system

We’re wanting into how the army investigates service members accused of crimes, intersects with the civilian justice system and treats instances that don’t make it to courts-martial. Guide us to necessary tales.

---

When you be a part of us at The Texas Tribune Festival Sept. 22-24 in downtown Austin, you’ll hear from changemakers who’re driving innovation, lawmakers who’re taking cost with new insurance policies, business leaders who’re pushing Texas ahead and so many others. See the rising speaker listing and buy tickets.