Monday, May 27, 2024

Alabama executes inmate convicted in ex-girlfriend’s 1994 shooting death


An Alabama inmate convicted of killing his former girlfriend many years in the past was executed Thursday evening regardless of pleas from the sufferer’s household to spare his life.

Joe Nathan James Jr. obtained a deadly injection at a south Alabama jail after the U.S. Supreme Court denied his request for a keep.

- Advertisement -

James was convicted and sentenced to death in the 1994 shooting death of Faith Hall, 26, in Birmingham. Hall’s daughters have mentioned they might fairly James serve life in jail, however Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey mentioned Wednesday that she deliberate to let the execution proceed.

Prosecutors mentioned James briefly dated Hall and he grew to become obsessed after she rejected him, stalking and harassing her for months earlier than killing her. On Aug. 15, 1994, after Hall had been out buying with a pal, James pressured his manner contained in the pal’s residence, pulled a gun from his waistband and shot Hall thrice, in line with courtroom paperwork.

Alabama executes inmate convicted in girlfriend's 1994 murder
An undated photograph of Joe Nathan James Jr., who was convicted of homicide in the 1994 shooting death of his ex-girlfriend. He was executed by deadly injection on July 28, 2022, close to Atmore, Alabama.  

- Advertisement -

(Alabama Department of Corrections)


A Jefferson County jury first convicted James of capital homicide in 1996 and voted to suggest the death penalty, which a choose imposed. The conviction was overturned when a state appeals courtroom dominated a choose had wrongly admitted some police experiences into proof. James was retried and once more sentenced to death in 1999, when jurors rejected protection claims that he was beneath emotional duress on the time of the shooting.

Hall’s two daughters, who had been 3 and 6 when their mom was killed, had mentioned lately that they might fairly James serve life in jail. The members of the family issued an announcement Thursday saying they won’t attend the execution.

- Advertisement -

“Today is a tragic day for our family. We are having to relive the hurt that this caused us many years ago,” the assertion issued via state Rep. Juandalynn Givan’s workplace learn. Givan was a pal of Hall’s.

“We hoped the state wouldn’t take a life simply because a life was taken and we have forgiven Mr. Joe Nathan James Jr. for his atrocities toward our family … We pray that God allows us to find healing after today and that one day our criminal justice system will listen to the cries of families like ours even if it goes against what the state wishes,” the household’s assertion learn.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall had urged Ivey to let the execution go ahead, writing that “it is our obligation to ensure that justice is done for the people of Alabama.”

“The jury in James’s case unanimously decided that his brutal murder of Faith Hall warranted a sentence of death,” Marshall mentioned.

In response to a reporter’s query, Ivey mentioned Wednesday that she wouldn’t intervene.

“My staff and I have researched all the records and all the facts and there’s no reason to change the procedure or modify the outcome. The execution will go forward,” she mentioned.

James argued that Ivey’s refusal violates spiritual freedom legal guidelines as a result of the Koran and the Bible “place the concept of forgiveness paramount in this situation.”

James acted as his personal lawyer in his bid to cease his execution, mailing handwritten lawsuits and enchantment notices to the courts from death row. A lawyer filed the most recent enchantment with the U.S. Supreme Court on his behalf Wednesday. But the request for a keep was rejected about half-hour earlier than the execution was set to start.

James requested justices for a keep, noting the opposition of Hall’s household and arguing that Alabama didn’t give inmates ample discover of their proper to pick out an alternate execution methodology.

The state argued that James waited too lengthy to start attempting to postpone his execution and “should not be rewarded for his transparent attempt to game the system.” While the sentiments of the sufferer’s household need to be thought-about, it mentioned, they are not cause for a courtroom to delay the execution.

James argued that after lawmakers authorized nitrogen hypoxia as a brand new execution methodology, Alabama officers gave inmates solely a quick window of time to pick out the brand new methodology and inmates didn’t know what was at stake after they had been handed a variety type with none clarification. Alabama shouldn’t be scheduling executions for inmates who chosen nitrogen. The state has not developed a system for utilizing nitrogen to hold out death sentences. 



story by The Texas Tribune Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest article