Why three Texas lawmakers are now eligible for an extra $140,000 a year

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s day by day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on probably the most important Texas news.

Just a few of Texas’ most veteran lawmakers might have seen their part-time legislative compensation skyrocket from $7,200 to just about $150,000 yearly, because of a regulation handed quietly on the finish of the 2021 legislative session.

Lawmakers with greater than 43 years of service are now eligible to gather an annual pension cost of $140,000 from the Employees Retirement System of Texas with out having to go away workplace — supplementing their meager salaries in a observe generally known as double dipping.

Currently, solely three state lawmakers qualify outright for the perk: Sen. John Whitmire and Rep. Senfronia Thompson, two Houston Democrats who first entered workplace 50 years in the past, in 1973, and Rep. Tom Craddick, a Midland Republican and former House speaker who has been in workplace for 54 years.

Whitmire, who’s operating for Houston mayor, mentioned final year he turned down the benefit when he grew to become eligible in late 2021. In January, he once more informed The Texas Tribune by way of his workplace that he had not double dipped into his pension fund. Citing privateness legal guidelines, the Employees Retirement System wouldn’t present information about which lawmakers had been tapping into the profit.

Thompson and Craddick haven’t mentioned in the event that they are making the most of the profit. Neither of their places of work responded to a number of requests for remark from the Tribune over a number of weeks.

It’s attainable different lawmakers might be incomes the profit as a result of the Employees Retirement System permits workers, together with state lawmakers, to purchase or switch credit for years of service.

Jon Taylor, a political science professor on the University of Texas at San Antonio who has taught public administration ethics, mentioned the association has problematic optics.

“It may not be illegal, [lawmakers] may in fact be quietly encouraged by some HR person, but when it comes to the public, it’s the appearance of something that just doesn’t feel right,” he mentioned.

Under the brand new regulation, state staff and lawmakers can start accumulating retirement funds whereas nonetheless working, as soon as their pension funds, or annuities, have maxed out based mostly on their years of service with the state. For the everyday lawmaker, that takes about 43.5 years.

While state staff have pension funds calculated based mostly on their salaries, lawmakers’ retirement advantages are tied to the salaries of state district judges. That means as an alternative of getting an annual pension capped at their $7,200 wage, profession lawmakers who serve lengthy sufficient can earn an annual pension that maxes out at $140,000, which was the bottom district choose wage in 2022. That cap may improve if the Legislature votes to extend judicial pay.

Lawmakers who retire are eligible to faucet into their pensions after eight years of credit in the event that they are over 60 or after 12 years of service in the event that they are over 50, which might yield annual funds of $3,220 per year of service.

Texas legislators serve half time, coming in for frequently scheduled legislative periods for 5 months each two years and pulling lower than $600 a month in wage for their official state duties.

Many are members of the skilled class: attorneys, engineers and physicians. That means, Taylor mentioned, they produce other avenues to avoid wasting for retirement that the common state worker — who often earns much less cash than they might obtain for the identical job within the non-public sector — doesn’t.

“We’re not talking about the average state employee who could double dip; we’re talking about people who voluntarily got elected to office and decided to run for office,” Taylor mentioned. “The rules are not the same for them.”

In the mid-2010s, the Legislature shut down a loophole that allowed former Gov. Rick Perry to double dip into his wage and pension. But the regulation change authorized final session basically created a new loophole.

The authentic model of the invoice, Senate Bill 321, authored by Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, was meant to handle a $15 million unfunded legal responsibility within the Employees Retirement System.

But within the House, the invoice’s sponsor, Rep. Greg Bonnen, R-Friendswood, launched an modification that will permit state staff and lawmakers older than 60 who’ve maxed out their annuities to double dip. Only 46 state staff had been eligible for the perk, the Houston Chronicle reported.

Almost nobody caught the Eleventh-hour change tacked on within the closing days of the legislative session. Bonnen defined the double dipping modification for one minute and 17 seconds within the chamber earlier than the House authorized it on a voice vote, a process used for noncontroversial objects that don’t have a lot opposition and don’t require a file vote. He didn’t point out it could apply to lawmakers, too.

“It literally got snuck in there. If the author of the piece of legislation didn’t know it was in there, what does it tell you?” Taylor mentioned. “It tells you it’s an 11th-hour, backroom, ‘let’s sneak this in in the last days of the Legislature’ deal.”

Bonnen didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark from the Tribune.

The invoice returned to the Senate, the place lawmakers may both approve the modifications or ship a invoice to a convention committee of the 2 chambers to hammer out the main points earlier than sending it again to each chambers for approval. But by the point the invoice was taken up within the Senate, the House was shut down as a result of Democrats had staged a walkout to attempt to block a invoice that will make voting legal guidelines within the state extra restrictive.

Huffman may both cross the hard-fought laws to handle the pension fund’s debt with the double-dipping provision or kill the invoice. She selected to cross the laws despite the fact that it included the double-dipping provision. But she informed the Houston Chronicle she meant to file laws to nix the availability within the subsequent legislative session.

“I do intend next session to file legislation to remove that provision,” Huffman informed the newspaper. “Even if someone has had a year of it, then it would stop.”

Huffman, nonetheless, has not filed laws to take away the availability, and her workplace has not responded to a number of requests for remark.

Taylor mentioned eradicating the availability can be the appropriate transfer, nevertheless it may show troublesome in a chamber of legislators who may stand to learn from it until there’s extra public stress.

“It’s a heavy lift,” he mentioned. “Perhaps it’s one of these things where somebody thought, ‘Hey we ought to do this,’ and suddenly it comes to the media and we never hear about it again.”

Disclosure: The University of Texas at San Antonio has been a monetary supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news group that’s funded partially by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Financial supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Find a full list of them here.