Texas court confirms the AG can’t unilaterally prosecute election cases

Sign up for The Brief, our each day publication that retains readers up to the mark on the most important Texas news.

Texas’ legal professional normal can’t unilaterally prosecute election cases, the state’s highest legal court confirmed Wednesday when it rejected a last-ditch request from the place’s present officeholder, Ken Paxton, to regain that energy.

Paxton misplaced the potential in December when eight of the nine members on the all-GOP court struck down a regulation permitting Paxton’s workplace to go after election cases with out the permission of native prosecutors. The court stated the regulation violated the separation-of-powers clause in the Texas Constitution. Paxton, joined by the state’s top GOP leaders, together with Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, criticized the ruling earlier this 12 months.

In the aftermath, Paxton filed a movement asking the state’s Court of Criminal Appeals to rehear the case, vacate its earlier opinion and affirm an appellate court’s judgment, which was in his favor.

“I still agree with our original decision handed down in December, when we recognized that the specific powers given to the Attorney General by the Texas Constitution do not include the ability to initiate criminal proceedings—even in cases involving alleged violations of the Election Code,” Judge Scott Walker wrote in a concurring opinion Wednesday.

The court didn’t problem a majority opinion; two judges dissented.

After the choice, Paxton said in a tweet it was time for the Legislature to “right this wrong.”

“The CCA’s shameful decision means local DAs with radical liberal views have the sole power to prosecute election fraud in TX—which they will never do,” Paxton wrote. “The timing is no accident—this is devastating for the integrity of our upcoming elections.”

This is a growing story that shall be up to date.