Sunday, June 23, 2024

COLUMN: Looking for Norman Bates | Oklahoma

“The secret to film is that it’s an illusion” — George Lucas

Yep, sitting right here at my laptop computer Thursday morning, snow on the bottom, temperature at 4 levels, wind chill of -19. It’s not what’s been our typical — prior to now 5 years or so — days earlier than Christmas. In reality, I can bear in mind virtually short-sleeve shirt climate a number of of these years.

The dreary, snowy chilly takes me again a couple of years to in regards to the sixth grade, once I can bear in mind a close to blizzard on Christmas Day, and hopes that my aunt and uncle and my three cousins have been in a position to make it to Waukomis for the vacation.

- Advertisement -

Not wanting ahead to getting my automotive de-iced for the trek to the News & Eagle newsroom.

But, life goes on.

Wednesday I had the Today Show on within the background, probably not listening and simply downing morning espresso, once they disclosed the highest films of all time, not less than in keeping with Variety.

- Advertisement -

And once they unveiled the journal’s prime No. 1 film of all time — “Psycho” — I used to be a bit bowled over.

Now I’d quibble with a variety of their Top 100 films, however there have been simply sufficient of what I think about the very best films of all time on the listing for me to not fireplace off a letter.

The extra I sat and considered Alfred Hitchcock’s psychological suspense thriller as the highest film of all time, the extra I couldn’t disagree with the selection.

- Advertisement -

Here’s the explanation for their alternative: it set off a complete era of us who at all times test their bathe, simply in case.

But, once more I requested, why “Psycho”?

And then it hit me. The earlier evening, after having come house from work at 11:20 at evening, I had heard a sound from the lavatory, and really went and gingerly checked the bathe for Norman Bates dressed as his useless mom, wielding a big kitchen knife and ready on Janet Leigh.

Well, possibly not Norman, however that’s why I checked.

Mr. Hitchcock, thought of one of many best movie administrators of all time, had planted it in my mind.

Turns out, it was one in all our cats, who loves the bathtub and bathe, and was lurking between the within and outdoors bathe curtains.

True story.

So, possibly Variety had one thing right here. Maybe it’s that thrillers nonetheless relaxation behind my thoughts.

I bear in mind “The Exorcist” prefer it was yesterday.

Not as a lot as “Psycho,” however sufficient.

I used to be recent out of school, wanting for a sports activities writing job on the Houston Post or the Chronicle and visiting my finest pal from highschool and school.

He and his youthful brother and one other school pal from OU all got down to go see “The Exorcist” in a blinding, driving rainstorm, which I used to be informed was not rare for Houston.

Anyway, we acquired to the movie show late, and have been just like the final 4 to enter as a result of the place was jam-packed.

In reality, we needed to cut up up and discover seats, and two of us — nonetheless dripping moist from the storm — needed to sit on the entrance row.

Anyway, the film definitely made an impression on us all, as a result of we acquired again to their condominium and barely slept — with all of the lights on.

Now, scanning by Variety’s Top 100 Movies of All Time, I did discover some particular nuggets I agree with.

“Saving Pvt. Ryan” was at No. 10, and I believe a bit low. I’d put it at No. 1 on my listing.

They had “Pulp Fiction” at No. 5 — prime 10, however a bit excessive.

They had “The Godfather” at No. 3, and I definitely haven’t any drawback with that nice film. And “The Wizard of Oz” was No. 2, and since I most likely watched it yearly for 20-plus years of my formative years, that’s most likely about proper.

“The Godfather, Part 2” was at No. 19, and once more too low for me, however that they had a variety of actually good films over time to think about.

For me, “The Silence of the Lambs” was method too low at No. 35, and the identical with “Lawrence of Arabia” and “Titanic” at 38 and 45.

Here’s the place I actually begin to quibble with their Top 100 listing.

They had “Boogie Nights” at Nov. 75. It was a reasonably good film, however come on.

When you set “The Shining” at No. 90 and 15 behind “Boogie Nights,” effectively their listing has a little bit of an issue for me.

Anyway, I’m a bit totally different in relation to films.

I really like films set in sure durations of historical past, like “Zulu,” “Dr. Zhivago” and “Chariots of Fire.”

I’m not a giant fan of film critics, who’ve out-sized opinions that hardly ever mirror mine.

OK, simply heard a noise from the lavatory. I gotta go test for Norman Bates.

Christy is news editor on the Enid News & Eagle. Visit his column weblog at www.tinyurl.com/Column-Blog.



submit credit score to Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest article