A look at the 20 articles of impeachment against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

A look at the 20 articles of impeachment against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton



Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton faces an impeachment trial in the state Senate beginning Tuesday on articles overwhelmingly licensed through the House of Representatives.

Paxton, a Republican and megastar of the conservatives felony motion, used to be suspended from place of business in May when the GOP-controlled House voted 121-23 to question him on 20 articles starting from bribery to abuse of public believe. Most of the articles take care of Paxton the usage of his place of business to learn a rich donor, Nate Paul, prompting 8 of the lawyer common’s best deputies to record him to the FBI in 2020.

Three different fees date again to Paxton’s pending 2015 felony securities fraud case, together with mendacity to state investigators. The Senate isn’t right away taking over the ones fees and a fourth associated with Paxton’s ethics filings in the impeachment trial.

Paxton has mentioned he expects to be acquitted and that the fees are in keeping with “hearsay and gossip, parroting long-disproven claims.”

Here’s look at the 20 articles of impeachment:

DISREGARD OF OFFICIAL DUTY

ARTICLE 1 – Protection of charitable group

Paxton is accused of failing to behave as a public protector of charitable organizations through directing his workers in the lawyer common’s place of business to intrude in a lawsuit introduced through the Roy F. & JoAnn Cole Mitte Foundation against entities managed through Paul, harming the Austin charity with the intention to receive advantages the wealthy donor.

ARTICLE 2 – Abuse of the opinion procedure

Paxton is accused of misusing his legit energy to factor written felony critiques. He allegedly had workers get ready an opinion that safe some of Paul’s homes from being offered in foreclosures. Paxton hid his movements through asking a Senate committee chairperson to hunt that opinion. He’s additionally accused of directing workers to opposite their felony conclusion to assist Paul.

ARTICLE 3 – Abuse of the open data procedure

Paxton is accused of misusing his legit energy through allegedly interfering together with his place of business’s dealing with of a public data request coping with the recordsdata of a felony investigation into Paul.

ARTICLE 4 – Misuse of legit information

Paxton is accused of misusing his energy to manage public information regulation through improperly acquiring up to now undisclosed information held through the lawyer common’s place of business to learn Paul.

DISREGARD OF OFFICIAL DUTY

ARTICLE 5 – Engagement of Cammack

Paxton is accused of misusing legit powers through hiring lawyer Brandon Cammack to research a baseless grievance made through Paul. That resulted in Cammack issuing greater than 30 grand jury subpoenas with the intention to assist Paul.

ARTICLE 6 – Termination of whistleblowers

Paxton is accused of violating the state’s whistleblower regulation through retaliating against employees who reported his alleged illegal acts to regulation enforcement, terminating them with out just right purpose or due procedure. He’s additionally accused of enticing in a private and non-private marketing campaign to impugn the ones workers’ skilled reputations or prejudice their long run employment.

MISAPPLICATION OF PUBLIC RESOURCES

ARTICLE 7 – Whistleblower investigation and record

Paxton is accused of misusing public assets through directing workers to behavior a sham investigation into terminated workers’ whistleblower lawsuits and submit a record containing false or deceptive statements in Paxton’s protection.

DISREGARD OF OFFICIAL DUTY

ARTICLE 8 – Settlement Agreement

Paxton is accused of misusing his legit powers through concealing his wrongful acts in reference to the whistleblower’s lawsuits through getting into into a settlement with the whistleblowers that gives for fee from public price range. The agreement halted the wrongful termination swimsuit and not on time the discovery of details and testimony at trial, to Paxton’s benefit. That allegedly avoided citizens from making an educated choice about his reelection in 2022.

CONSTITUTIONAL BRIBERY

ARTICLE 9 – Paul’s employment of a girl with whom Paxton has stated having an affair

It is said that Paxton benefited from Paul’s decision to hire the woman. In trade, Paul allegedly gained favorable felony the aid of, or specialised get entry to to, the lawyer common’s place of business.

ARTICLE 10 – Paul’s offering renovations to Paxton house

It is said that during trade for offering the renovations, Paul gained favorable felony the aid of, or specialised get entry to to, the lawyer common’s place of business.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

ARTICLE 11 – Abuse of judicial procedure

Paxton is accused of abusing the procedure to thwart justice in the securities fraud case against him. It is said that Paxton hid details from citizens with protracted prolong of that trial, fighting citizens from making an educated choice about his election. The Senate isn’t, at least to begin with, taking over this text in Paxton’s impeachment trial.

ARTICLE 12 – Abuse of judicial procedure

It is said that Paxton benefited from donor Jeff Blackard’s lawsuit that interfered with fee of the prosecutors in Paxton’s securities fraud case. That allegedly not on time the case, together with discovery of details and testimony at trial, and disadvantaged citizens of an opportunity to make an educated choice when balloting for lawyer common.

The Senate isn’t, at least to begin with, taking over this text in Paxton’s impeachment trial.

FALSE STATEMENTS IN OFFICIAL RECORDS

ARTICLE 13 – State Securities Board investigation

Paxton is accused of making false statements to the State Securities Board in reference to its investigation of his failure to sign up with the board as an funding adviser required through state regulation.

The Senate isn’t, at least to begin with, taking over this text in Paxton’s impeachment trial.

ARTICLE 14- Personal monetary statements

Paxton is accused of failing to completely and correctly divulge monetary pursuits in his monetary statements filed with the Texas Ethics Commission.

The Senate isn’t, at least to begin with, taking over this text in Paxton’s impeachment trial.

ARTICLE 15 – Whistleblower reaction record

It is said that Paxton made or led to to be made more than one false or deceptive statements in the long written record issued through his place of business in keeping with whistleblower allegations.

ARTICLE 16 – CONSPIRACY AND ATTEMPTED CONSPIRACY

Paxton is accused of conspiring or making an attempt to conspire with others to dedicate acts described in a number of articles.

ARTICLE 17 – MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC RESOURCES

Paxton is accused of misusing his legit powers through inflicting workers to accomplish services and products for his receive advantages and the receive advantages of others.

ARTICLE 18 – DERELICTION OF DUTY

Paxton is accused of violating the Texas Constitution, his oaths of place of business, statutes and public coverage against public officers appearing opposite to the public passion through enticing in acts described in a number of articles.

ARTICLE 19 – UNFITNESS FOR OFFICE

Paxton is accused of enticing in misconduct, non-public or public, of such persona as to suggest his unfitness for place of business, as proven through the acts described in a number of articles.

ARTICLE 20 – ABUSE OF PUBLIC TRUST

Paxton is accused of the usage of, misusing or failing to make use of legit powers to subvert the lawful operation of the state executive and hinder the truthful and independent management of justice, bringing the lawyer common’s place of business into scandal and eroding public self assurance in state executive, as proven through the acts described in a number of articles.