May 12, 2023 at 6:00 a.m. EDT
Over the previous 15 years, nonprofit employment has grown 35 %, dwarfing the 9 % task expansion loved via the for-profit personal sector over that point. Nonprofits have handed native executive to turn out to be the second-largest supply of employment within the nation, behind the for-profit sector.
The most sensible 5 states for nonprofit employment are all within the Northeast, with Vermont main a New England sweep of the rostrum, at the side of Maine and Massachusetts. Pennsylvania and Rhode Island spherical out the highest 5. (D.C., that inveterate outlier, would beat out each and every state for first position — but it surely might not be honest to check a dense city core that also is the country’s capital with the sprawl of your reasonable American state.)
At the ground of the ratings are Texas, that bastion of privatization, self-reliant Nevada and the storm-battered territory of Puerto Rico.
Women are about two times as more likely to paintings at nonprofits as their male friends, and nonprofits have the smallest salary gaps of any sector. The conventional lady at a nonprofit makes about 88 % as a lot each and every hour as her male counterpart, an enormous development over the 80 % she’d earn within the for-profit sector, and successfully tied with the 87 % she’d make within the federal executive.
As a rule, the extra skilled and older you might be, the much more likely you might be to have a nonprofit task. Having a sophisticated level makes you 3 times likelier to do nonprofit paintings than your pals who didn’t make it previous highschool.
That’s partially as a result of drugs has swallowed a lot of the nonprofit sector. When you recall to mind nonprofits, you recall to mind scrappy do-gooders working on donations. But 1 in each and every 5 nonprofit jobs are in hospitals, and 1 in 3 are within the well being sector extra widely. About 2 in 5 sanatorium jobs in all of the nation are in nonprofits. Nonprofit hospitals make use of greater than two times as many of us as schools, personal faculties or spiritual organizations — the following biggest nonprofit industries.
The South’s loss of nonprofits in large part displays a loss of nonprofit drugs. Other forms of nonprofits have a tendency to be extra equitably dispensed. As readers Tim Carter in Seattle and Joe Bogucki in Newnan, Ga., identified once we appeared into credit rankings, the South’s surfeit of for-profit hospitals may well be one more reason that area has such excessive scientific debt.
Why are glasses extra commonplace than listening to aids?
In a prior column, we tested the ubiquity of eyeglasses. But we didn’t have time to deal with a follow-up query from reader Brenda Philips, who sought after to understand why such a lot of folks put on glasses versus listening to aids.
Another nice query, Brenda! We owe you an advantage button.
For the document, sure: glasses some distance outpace listening to aids. Only 3 % of American adults put on listening to aids, whilst nearly two thirds people put on glasses, in line with our research of the National Health Interview Survey, performed via the Census Bureau on behalf of the National Center for Health Statistics. And as with glasses, use of listening to aids ascends with age.
About 20 % of Americans age 75 or older put on listening to aids, which can be extra prevalent amongst males (25 %) than amongst girls (15 %). More skilled fogeys are much more likely to put on listening to aids, as are fogeys who earn extra.
But the largest gaps are racial. Among the 70-plus crowd, Whites are about two times as more likely to have listening to aids as everyone else, and just about 4 occasions as most probably as Black Americans — 18 % as opposed to 5 %.
But is it that Whites are much more likely to lose their listening to, or simply that they’re much more likely to right kind that loss? Both, if truth be told!
Whites are two times as most probably as their Black buddies to mention they’re having “moderate trouble” or “a lot of trouble” with their listening to — 22 % as opposed to 11 %. And they’re nearly two times as more likely to get listening to aids — 57 % as opposed to 32 % of the ones with listening to hassle.
Overall, hearing-aid use has risen up to now decade. Kristen Conners, audiologist and proprietor of Prescription Hearing within the sylvan suburb of Palos Park, south of Chicago, tells us that’s most probably because of main technological advances that have made the units way more relaxed and efficient — and some distance much less visual.
Age-related listening to loss (presbycusis) seems to be much less prevalent than age-related imaginative and prescient loss (presbyopia). But each are pervasive. It’s simply that listening to loss will have an effect on maximum people whilst imaginative and prescient loss will have an effect on principally all people.
Which brings us again to Brenda’s query: why aren’t listening to aids extra commonplace?
When we requested Connors, she spoke with the weary, battle-scarred point of view of a pro who has spent 3 a long time convincing those that, sure, their partner is correct: You in reality do have listening to difficulties. And sure, listening to aids would assist.
“It’s not an impairment or disability that you see or feel,” Connors stated. When your eyes begin to cross, you’ll understand what you’re lacking. A battery of blobs swim placidly the place the menu was once. But when your ears cross — normally round age 65 — there’s little to cue you in to the entire noises popping off round you.
“Your brain and body just adapts or adjusts,” Connors informed us. “The person who has the hearing loss doesn’t realize it at first.” It frequently takes the out of doors point of view of a partner or kid to indicate they’re lacking anything else in any respect.
Hearing aids also are freighted with stigma, Connors stated. About part of younger adults put on spectacles, which is able to imbue some frames with an air of mystery of hipness. But in spite of their contemporary high-tech makeover, listening to aids retain an only-for-old-folks stigma.
The absolute best query we will be able to’t resolution
What is the blended weight of the entire bar code stickers on end result and greens, yearly? Every time I peel one off, and be certain they don’t finally end up in my compost pile, I ponder about this!
— Tamsen McGinley in San Jose
Is it too past due to modify our identify to “Department of We Don’t Have Data, but We Did Some Back-of-the-Envelope Math?” Because it kills us that we will be able to’t resolution hilarious and all-important questions like those. Maybe an alert reader with connections to the produce-packing business can assist us out?
For now, we will be able to inform you that Americans spent about $114 billion up to now yr on contemporary end result and greens, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Produce fed on about 10 % of our grocery and liquor-store spending, simply behind bakery merchandise and simply forward of the class that comes with mineral waters, comfortable beverages and vegetable juices.
While grocery spending has fallen as superstores and era have pushed down costs, our loyalty to contemporary fruit and greens stays. They make up about as a lot of our meals funds as they did in 1960 — even if there was once a wild time within the Nineteen Seventies and 80s when processed and canned produce nearly handed the true deal; and spending on candies if truth be told handed spending on contemporary produce for far of the Carter management sooner than we got here to our senses.
We must observe that our figures for processed produce don’t come with wine, which has swallowed up extra and extra of our meals funds. Since the flip of the millennium, the typical American has spent extra on fermented fruit than at the contemporary selection — which is one approach to get your fruit with out the ones perfidious produce stickers.
Greetings! Here on the The Department of Data, we rely on your quantitative questions. What do you surprise about: Who works the longest hours? How have commuting patterns modified because the pandemic? Where was once kid care (more than likely) most expensive in 2018? Just ask!
If your query evokes a column, we’ll ship an respectable Department of Data button and ID card. This week’s buttons cross to Brenda, once more, in addition to Tamsen, Tim, Joe and Leslie.
