[my_unibots_shortcode_1]
Jon Rahm has an ally, and a crucial one at that. Rahm spoke out in opposition to the Official World Golf Rankings two weeks in the past, and on Tuesday on the Hero World Challenge, Tiger Woods agreed together with his sentiments.
Rahm’s argument, in its most elementary kind, was that the OWGR shouldn’t be rewarding the RSM Classic winner with 37 factors and the DP World Tour Championship winner with simply 22 factors when the latter had to defeat seven prime 25 gamers on this planet and the previous had to defeat none. The OWGR, alternatively, has structured its factors system to reward beating greater fields moderately than smaller ones (the DP World Tour Championship had simply 50 gamers whereas the RSM had 156).
“OWGR, it’s a flawed system,” stated Woods. “That’s something we all here recognize. The field at Dubai got less points than Sea Island, and more of the top players were there in Dubai, so obviously there’s a flawed system.
“How do you repair it? You know, these are conferences we’re going to have to have. We’re going to have to have it with World Golf committee and in addition to … the primary excursions which might be concerned in it. Somehow provide you with a higher system than is in place now.”
The downside right here is that the OWGR is probably going at all times going to be a flawed system. It represents a zero-sum sport (there can solely be one No. 1 and one No. 2 and so forth), which implies that any person is nearly at all times going to be upset about how factors are constituted.
World No. 1 Rory McIlroy disagreed with Rahm (and now Woods) in regards to the present system.
“So when you look at two different fields, you’ve got a 50-man field here versus a 144-man field there [actually 156],” he stated. “So simply when it comes to how the strengths of area is calculated, they’ve 90 extra gamers to contribute to their power of area. So the rationale that this has obtained 21 factors [actually 22] and the RSM has obtained 39 [actually 37] is the person who wins the RSM has to beat 139 different guys [actually 155]. You solely have to beat 49 different guys right here. It’s a a lot fairer system. I feel it rewards people who — it is pure numbers. Strength of area has not damage folks emotions.
“Has it upset people? Yes, because people have been used to getting a certain amount of [OWGR] points in one event and now it’s dropped. But I would say those events were getting more than they should be. I think it’s the fairest system that you can come up with right now. And a lot of work went into that, five years of algorithms and analysis and work went on into the system, so it’s not as if it changed overnight. A lot has went into it. It’s the best one that we can come up with right now, and I think it will take a while. It will take another 18 months for it to play out because everyone gets two years into the rolling system.
“It’s a little bit — because it’s being rolled out, there’s a little little bit of discrepancy, however as soon as we get two years into it and have the minimal divisor and all of the occasions. I feel you may see a fairer reflection of the place everyone seems to be ranked on this planet that’s eligible.”
Woods didn’t call the OWGR laughable like Rahm did, however absolutely the members of the OWGR — which embody the PGA Tour, DP World Tour, Augusta National Golf Club, PGA of America, R&A, USGA and International Federation of PGA Tours — will take into consideration Woods’ phrases about a revamped system that was lately applied in August.
“I remember in my career, when I had a big lead in my career, I didn’t have to play a single tournament the next year and I still would be ranked No. 1,” stated Woods. “We changed that system then. So it has been changed in the past, and I’m sure this will be changed hopefully soon.”
All of that is terribly nuanced, after all, and as Data Golf pointed out, the OWGR truly rewards the decrease half of smaller fields greater than it does the decrease half of larger fields.
There are additionally only a few situations of small fields with nice gamers on the highest excursions. It’s a downside that I’m not optimistic is sufficiently big to deserve a answer. Regardless, this can be mentioned into the long run, particularly given the demand from LIV — which additionally has small fields with some good gamers — for OWGR factors within the close to future.
Woods spent a document 683 weeks atop the Official World Golf Rankings. Greg Norman is second with 331.
[my_adsense_shortcode_1]
Source link
[my_taboola_shortcode_1]
