Texas senators seem open to major change to school funding formula

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s day by day publication that retains readers up to velocity on essentially the most important Texas news.

During the Senate Finance Committee’s first public schooling listening to Monday, senators appeared open to reconsidering the core metric used to decide how a lot cash the state provides faculties per scholar, a swap that many school districts say would end in hundreds of thousands in further funding.

Several senators questioned Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath on whether or not it will be clever for the state to change the premise of the state’s public schooling formula from common day by day attendance to enrollment, as many Texas superintendents have requested.

“This is a key policymaking question,” Morath mentioned. “An enrollment-based financial system is much more discernible; it’s predictable. You have a little bit more budget stability from an enrollment perspective than you do on an average daily attendance basis.”

But Morath mentioned the upside to an attendance-based system is that it creates an incentive for school districts to find children which are lacking or chronically absent.

“On an average daily attendance basis, literally every day that a kid shows up to school counts,” he mentioned.

Morath additionally estimated that if Texas have been to overhaul its total public schooling funding system and base it on enrollment, it will price the state an additional $6 billion per funds cycle.

In Texas, the state provides cash to faculties based mostly on their college students’ common day by day attendance fee. If a scholar misses school, their district’s attendance common goes down, and so does the sum of money it receives. And in a post-COVID-19 world wherein dad and mom are faster to hold their youngsters residence in the event that they’re feeling ailing, some districts’ finances have grow to be extra risky than ever.

Texas has about 5.5 million Okay-12 college students, however solely about 92% of them commonly attended courses final school yr, that means faculties missed out on hundreds of thousands in funding from the remaining college students. The state provides faculties a base quantity of $6,160 per scholar, which has not elevated since 2019. Districts obtain further funding based mostly on different elements, together with the variety of college students with particular educational wants within the district, equivalent to bilingual college students.

Supporters of enrollment-based funding say the change would higher replicate districts’ budgeting wants as they put together for brand spanking new bills at first of every school yr. State Rep. Gina Hinojosa, D-Austin, has already filed House Bill 31, which might base the funding formula on enrollment.

State Sen. Robert Nichols, R-Jacksonville, has supported attendance-based funding however signaled that he could change his opinion if truancy legal guidelines usually are not addressed.

Nichols mentioned that even when Texas school districts have the inducement to make it possible for college students are displaying up to school, they don’t have enforcement mechanisms to assist them as a result of present truancy legal guidelines don’t enable districts to have “teeth” with dad and mom. In 2015, Texas handed a regulation that decriminalized truancy, which is when a scholar deliberately misses school.

Morath mentioned he believes there is perhaps inventive options that present each monetary stability for districts and incentives to get children in school. For instance, he mentioned, lawmakers might resolve to hold attendance because the core metric to decide how a lot faculties obtain per scholar however base the cash they get for bilingual college students on enrollment.

“There are any number of ways that the Legislature could entertain improvements to try to both add financial stability while maintaining the incentive to go after the most at-risk kids,” he mentioned.

Morath additionally informed senators that the TEA has projected that state enrollment can be on the decline till not less than 2025 due to falling delivery charges and extra dad and mom opting to residence school their youngsters or ship them to non-public faculties. In explicit, the quantity of households that withdrew their youngsters from public faculties to home school them instead noticed a notable enhance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

“What we saw essentially during COVID was a massive exit to alternative forms of education,” Morath mentioned.

State Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, requested if enacting a school voucher system would contribute to extra youngsters being pulled out of the general public schooling system, leading to much less funding for faculties. Vouchers are essentially the most generally recognized type of “school choice,” a label used to describe state packages that give dad and mom cash to school their youngsters outdoors the general public schooling system. Critics say such packages siphon funds away from public faculties.

Morath informed Whitmire that the reply to his query “potentially depends on how any program like that would be structured.”

Senators additionally mentioned the necessity to decrease the recapture funds that property-rich school districts make to the state to assist property-poor districts. The program is informally often called “Robin Hood.”

The burden of this system on property-rich school districts has grown greater than beforehand estimated. It is projected that districts pays about $5.06 billion by way of the Robin Hood program by 2025. Six years in the past, that quantity was projected at about $2 billion, State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, mentioned.

Morath mentioned property tax cuts deliberate by lawmakers this session could assist deliver these funds down.

When the dialog shifted to psychological well being funding within the wake of the Uvalde capturing, state Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, mentioned he needs to see cash allotted to hiring extra social staff in faculties.

But Morath mentioned the TEA didn’t embrace such a request in its funds as a result of there isn’t any requirement for school districts to use any sum of money to rent psychological well being counselors.

“If you wanted to see changes in student-counselor ratios then you’d either need to tell districts they need to spend their money differently or create new funding buckets just for that,” Morath informed West.