Home News Georgia Lawmaker questions audit on Georgia’s Qualified Education Expense Tax Credit | Georgia

Lawmaker questions audit on Georgia’s Qualified Education Expense Tax Credit | Georgia

Georgia Composite Medical Board failed to progress on some audit findings | Georgia

[my_adsense_shortcode_1]

(The Center Square) — A Georgia lawmaker is pushing again on a state audit that indicated Georgia’s Qualified Education Expense Tax Credit may just save the state and native college districts tens of millions of greenbacks in bills, calling it a “loser for Georgia taxpayers.”

The Georgia Department of Audits & Accounts may just now not resolve the precise fiscal have an effect on as a result of the unknown “switcher rate” — what number of scholarship recipients would have attended a public college with no scholarship from a Student Scholarship Organization.

“Upon review, any alleged profitability for the state is a non sequitur fallacy of an audit that did not include financial results or ‘switcher rate’ data that is directly linked to the Georgia program,” Rep. Lisa Campbell, D-Kennesaw, stated in a observation.

“Instead, the analysis uses an indirect 67 percent switcher rate, but data collected in this analysis was much lower,” Campbell added. “Using the reported switcher data that averaged 32 percent, there would be a projected tax loss – not a savings. According to the reported calculation, there would be a substantial negative impact to the state if the actual switcher rate reported by the SSOs is used. This is a loser for Georgia taxpayers to the tune of at least $81 million annually and more than $172 million over the last few years.”

The state created the QEEC in 2008 with House Bill 1133. It permits company and particular person taxpayers to earn a “dollar-for-dollar tax credit” for donating to organizations that give scholarships to personal college scholars.

A news liberate indicated Campbell plans to push law requiring further SSO knowledge, however a spokesperson didn’t reply to a request for extra information.

“Data can answer the questions regarding financial viability, savings and student learning outcomes, but only when data is transparent,” Campbell stated. “This report should not be used to suggest that siphoning taxpayer dollars from our public schools to private entities saves taxpayers money, furthers parental choice or improves students’ educational opportunities. Using this report as the impetus to tout taxpayer savings is a prevarication.”

This article First gave the impression in the center square

Exit mobile version