Home Sports golf Jon Rahm blasts ‘laughable’ OWGR system: ‘I think they have devalued the...

Jon Rahm blasts ‘laughable’ OWGR system: ‘I think they have devalued the value of the better players’

Jon Rahm blasts ‘laughable’ OWGR system: ‘I think they have devalued the value of the better players’

[my_unibots_shortcode_1]

Jon Rahm isn’t afraid to let you know what he thinks, and now he has some ideas on the Official World Golf Rankings. While most OWGR debates in latest weeks have centered on whether or not the group would afford factors to LIV Golf members in the future, Rahm went after the OWGR for a unique cause forward of the season-ending DP World Tour Championship in Dubai.

Rahm is miffed that the winner of the DP World Tour Championship — a subject which incorporates himself, Rory McIlroy, Matt Fitzpatrick Viktor Hovland, Shane Lowry and Tyrrell Hatton, who’re all prime 30 gamers in the OWGR — solely receives 22 OWGR factors whereas the winner of the RSM Classic on the PGA Tour will obtain 38 factors.

The cause the winner of the RSM Classic receives so many extra factors than the DP World Tour Championship winner is that the DP World Tour Championship solely has 50 opponents whereas the RSM Classic has 144. In different phrases, the OWGR believes it’s tougher to defeat 143 decent-to-bad gamers than seven actually good gamers and 42 different common gamers. This does not sit nicely with Rahm, who’s one of these seven actually good gamers.

“I’m going to be as blunt as I can,” stated Rahm. “I think the OWGR proper now’s laughable. Laughable. Laughable. The incontrovertible fact that the RSM does not have any of the prime 20 in the world has extra factors than this occasion the place we have seven of the prime 20 is laughable. The incontrovertible fact that Wentworth had much less factors than Napa, having gamers in the prime 10 in the world is laughable.

“I understand what they are trying to do with the depth of field, but having the best players in the world automatically makes the tournament better. I don’t care what their system says. I think they have made a mistake. I think some aspects of it might be beneficial, but I think they have devalued the value of the better players.

“Like simply, for instance, the 30 finest gamers of the yr shouldn’t be punished as a result of it is a smaller subject. Depth of subject doesn’t suggest better event. I might go on and on. I think they have missed the mark on that stance fairly a bit.”

Rahm makes some good factors right here, and this can be a deviation from the previous OWGR system, which was modified earlier in 2022. For instance, final yr’s DP World Tour Championship awarded 46 factors to the champion whereas the RSM Classic awarded 44 to its winner. The modifications in the OWGR in 2022 affected smaller occasions fairly a bit and lowered their subject ranking considerably in comparison with what it was.

What’s attention-grabbing is that although the winner of the RSM is probably disproportionately rewarded for his victory, the additional you go down the leaderboard, the extra the smaller subject is rewarded. For example, to earn one OGWR level at the RSM Classic, you need to end fiftieth (or beat 93 different gamers). To earn one OWGR level at the DP World Tour Championship, you need to end twenty eighth (or beat 21 different gamers).

“Listen, it’s above my pay grade to know how the math works, and I understand they are — prioritizing is not the word but they are giving certain value to the depth of the field as well and the ranking on the lower parts of the lower,” added Rahm.

“But would you somewhat win a event if you have the No. 1 participant in the world there or since you have the thirtieth or sixth there? I think it is extra worthwhile when you’re beating [the] finest gamers in the world. I think rather a lot of individuals would agree and I think it ought to mirror that.

“And if it’s not like that, at least the point gap shouldn’t be as vastly different as it is right now. Because we are not talking about the best PGA Tour events in the season where you have multiple, multiple high-ranked players. We are talking about a tournament that didn’t even have one player in the top 20. That, to me, is an issue when you have seven of them here. I don’t know what the fix is, right. I understand what they were trying to do when they changed some things, but I think like I said, they missed the mark.”

McIlroy, who’s the No. 1 participant in the world and likewise in the subject this week in Dubai, praised the new system on Tuesday.

“Has it upset individuals? Yes, as a result of individuals have been used to getting a certain quantity of [OWGR] factors in a single occasion and now it is dropped. But I might say these occasions have been getting greater than they must be.

“I think it’s the fairest system that you can come up with right now. And a lot of work went into that; five years of algorithms and analysis and work went on into the system, so it’s not as if it changed overnight. A lot has went into it. It’s the best one that we can come up with right now, and I think it will take a while. It will take another 18 months for it to play out because everyone gets two years into the rolling system.

“As it is being rolled out, there’s a bit of bit of discrepancy, however as soon as we get two years into it and have the minimal divisor and all the occasions. I think you may see a fairer reflection of the place everyone seems to be ranked in the world that’s eligible.”



[my_adsense_shortcode_1]

Source link

[my_taboola_shortcode_1]

Exit mobile version