In rural Texas, Beto O’Rourke hammers Greg Abbott over school vouchers

Sign up for The Brief, our every day e-newsletter that retains readers up to the mark on probably the most important Texas news.

A battle over school vouchers is mounting within the race to be Texas governor, set into movement after Republican incumbent Greg Abbott supplied his clearest assist but for the thought in May.

His Democratic challenger, Beto O’Rourke, is hammering Abbott over the problem on the marketing campaign path, particularly searching for a bonus in rural Texas, the place Democrats badly know they should do higher and the place vouchers cut up Republicans. O’Rourke’s marketing campaign can be working newspaper advertisements in no less than 17 markets, principally rural, that urge voters to “reject Greg Abbott’s radical plan to defund” public faculties.

Abbott, in the meantime, just isn’t shying away from the controversy he ignited when he said in May that he helps giving dad and mom “the choice to send their children to any public school, charter school or private school with state funding following the student.” He met privately final week with Corey DeAngelis, an aggressive nationwide school alternative activist who had beforehand criticized Abbott as insufficiently supportive of the trigger.

“School choice” tends to consult with the broad idea of giving dad and mom the choice to ship their youngsters to varsities past their native public school, whereas vouchers would permit dad and mom to make use of state tax {dollars} to subsidize tuition for these different choices, together with personal faculties. Opponents of vouchers say they hurt public school methods by draining their funding. In the Legislature, vouchers have lengthy encountered resistance from Democrats and rural Republicans whose public faculties are the lifeblood of their communities.

O’Rourke is leaning into the bipartisan salience of the problem.

“For our rural communities, where there’s only one school district and only one option of public school, he wants to defund that through vouchers, take your tax dollars out of your classroom and send it to a private school in Dallas or Austin or somewhere else at your expense,” O’Rourke informed a rural viewers just lately.

It is a quote that O’Rourke’s marketing campaign is repeating in a digital ad that argues Abbott has “left behind” rural Texas.

Abbott’s marketing campaign stated O’Rourke’s newspaper advertisements are a “complete lie,” accusing O’Rourke of siding with “union bosses” over dad and mom.

“The Governor strongly believes parents deserve more involvement in their children’s education,” Abbott spokesperson Mark Miner stated in an electronic mail. “The real question is why is O’Rourke so afraid of parental involvement with their children’s education? Shouldn’t families across Texas have the same opportunities that Beto’s parents had to send their kids to the school of their choice?”

O’Rourke went to a public school, El Paso High School, for 2 years earlier than attending a personal, all-male boarding school in Virginia.

His marketing campaign has been working the newspaper advertisements because the finish of the school yr, round excessive school graduations. They have appeared in newspapers with decisively rural readerships, just like the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, Amarillo Globe and Nacogdoches Daily Sentinel. They are personalized to every market, telling readers of the Abilene Reporter-News, for instance, that they need to not “let Greg Abbott privatize public education in Abilene.”

O’Rourke’s marketing campaign stated it has spent “around $40,000” on the newspaper advertisements, a drop within the bucket in contrast with the $23.9 million money readily available it had on the finish of June — not to mention Abbott’s $45.7 million in reserves. But it’s the first identified paid media the marketing campaign has accomplished past its internet advertising, and it marks a deliberate alternative by O’Rourke’s marketing campaign to attraction to rural voters who lengthy have been key to blocking a Democratic breakthrough statewide.

O’Rourke has been outspoken about vouchers earlier than, together with throughout his 2020 presidential marketing campaign, when his statements directed attention to his wife, Amy O’Rourke, who based a constitution school and continues to advocate for them. Asked about that within the context of the present race, O’Rourke spokesperson Chris Evans supplied an announcement reiterating that O’Rourke “will put an end to Greg Abbott’s attacks on public education” and famous his three youngsters attend public faculties in El Paso.

Texas Democrats are acutely conscious they should enhance their margins in rural Texas in the event that they need to have a greater likelihood at profitable statewide. Delegates to the state get together conference final month reelected the chair, Gilberto Hinojosa, after a aggressive race wherein the get together’s neglect of rural Texas was hotly debated.

In a current interview, Hinojosa stated rural Texas was the “primary reason Beto was not able to win at the very end [of his 2018 U.S. Senate campaign], even though he came very close.”

“We have to do better, and we’ve believed that for a long time,” Hinojosa stated, including that it has “always been a question of scarceness of resources” fairly than a query of the get together’s understanding of the significance of rural Texas.

With Abbott’s embrace of vouchers, Democrats imagine they’ve a powerful alternative to loosen the GOP stranglehold on rural Texas. Another Democratic statewide candidate, Mike Collier for lieutenant governor, has been getting the eye of distinguished GOP names like U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz after tweeting a clip from a current speech wherein he declared “vouchers are for vultures.” The present lieutenant governor, Republican Dan Patrick, has lengthy championed the proposal, predating Abbott.

Abbott himself has acknowledged his May assertion was significant. Later that month, he asserted to reporters that he has at all times supported school alternative however needed to “make it abundantly clear not only that I support it but the strategy to achieve it, where the funding follows the student, which is the way that it should be.”

Polling on vouchers in Texas may be dicey provided that it’s typically accomplished by curiosity teams and the language of questions varies.

In an April survey from an unbiased pollster, the University of Texas at Austin, 45% of voters stated they supported — and 40% stated they opposed — “redirecting state tax revenue to help parents pay for some of the cost of sending their children to private or parochial schools.” The pro-voucher Texas Public Policy Foundation sponsored a poll in February that discovered 78% of Hispanic adults in Texas — a part of a demographic that Republicans are concentrating on in November — assist the “right to use the tax dollars designated for their child’s education to send their child to whatever school, public, charter, or private school that best serves their needs.” And in May, shortly earlier than Abbott’s feedback, the anti-voucher Texas Parent PAC commissioned a survey that discovered 46% of probably voters assist — and 43% oppose — “a school voucher program in Texas,” in keeping with a memo that didn’t present the query language.

Abbott met July 26 with DeAngelis, who tweeted an image of the 2 afterward shaking palms at Abbott’s marketing campaign headquarters in Austin. An Abbott spokesperson, Renae Eze, stated they “discussed school choice, parental involvement, and various groups working together to ensure Texas students receive the best possible education opportunity.”

DeAngelis is the nationwide director of analysis on the American Federation for Children. His assembly with Abbott was particularly notable since he has beforehand criticized Abbott over his endorsements of candidates in state House primaries backed by lecturers unions.

Vouchers proceed to face an uphill battle within the chamber, the place they’ve lengthy hit a wall of opposition from Democrats and rural Republicans. Last session, the House voted 115-29 on a funds modification to ban vouchers, with a majority of Republicans siding with Democrats. The modification didn’t make it within the ultimate funds after late negotiations with the Senate.

The newest GOP primaries and runoffs didn’t considerably develop the pro-voucher crowd within the House. School alternative teams spent massive to unseat two unfriendly GOP incumbents — Reps. Glenn Rogers of Graford and Kyle Kacal of College Station — however have been unsuccessful.

Another rural Republican who opposes vouchers, Rep. Drew Darby of San Angelo, stated he thought the problem might have an effect on the governor’s race. He didn’t criticize Abbott however stated he “would hope and pray” that defending public training is a matter that drives individuals to the polls.

He stated his precedence is to symbolize the communities in his district, and “they’re dominated by independent school districts that are the lifeblood of our communities,” noting they’re typically the biggest employer.

“If that school district goes away, the identity of that community goes away,” Darby stated. “I am supportive of that institution in these communities, and I want to make sure they have all the resources they need to certainly maintain the support of that efficient system of public free schools, which our constitution requires. Anything that takes away from that, I will oppose.”

In different corners of the House GOP caucus, there’s rising optimism for school alternative subsequent session, particularly after Abbott’s May assertion. The group acquired a lift two months earlier when a GOP major poll proposition handed with 88% assist that stated dad and mom “should have the right to select schools, whether public or private, for their children, and the funding should follow the student.”

One of probably the most vocal advocates within the House has been Rep. Brian Harrison of Midlothian, who stated Abbott is true to lean in to the trigger. O’Rourke, Harrison stated, “attended elite private schools, yet sides with liberal extremists to … deny poor kids the education opportunities he had.”

“Gov. Abbott wants to empower parents with education freedom so every child can get a quality education,” Harrison stated. “There may be no more important issue than school choice. It’s the right thing to do. It’s also a political winner.”

The newest marketing campaign finance stories additionally supplied fodder for the vouchers struggle. One of O’Rourke’s greatest donors was the American Federation of Teachers, the second-largest lecturers union in America that has lengthy opposed vouchers, which gave $300,000. Abbott has lengthy had giant donors whose pursuits embrace school alternative, and one in every of his greatest contributors on the newest submitting was Stuart Stedman, a Houston investor and distinguished advocate for constitution faculties who gave $300,000.

Disclosure: The University of Texas at Austin, the Texas Public Policy Foundation and Stuart Stedman have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Financial supporters play no function within the Tribune’s journalism. Find an entire checklist of them here.

When you be a part of us at The Texas Tribune Festival Sept. 22-24 in downtown Austin, you’ll hear from changemakers who’re driving innovation, lawmakers who’re taking cost with new insurance policies, business leaders who’re pushing Texas ahead and so many others. See the rising speaker checklist and buy tickets.