My husband instantly questioned the well being of the canine, and it was waved off. I then mentioned I wasn’t comfy with a canine, nonetheless so younger, who was so lately so sick — vomiting simply two weeks in the past — being each close to my canine and my very younger youngsters. Not to point out the truth that he isn’t housebroken, chews, bites like all puppies do, and we now have a canine that goes completely insane round different canines, getting very tough. My twins are 1 and might’t stroll, spending all their time on the ground.
My mother-in-law is furious and says this is as a result of I do not like Sally — which is true, we now have a protracted contentious historical past — and if the canine cannot come, then neither can Sally. She additionally mentioned the brand new canine is “part of the family” and I’d higher simply get used to it.
Am I being unreasonable right here? We’ve by no means allowed friends with canines. The concept of a lodge was written off, and the canine is too younger/sick to be boarded.
Not Comfortable: Oh for fox’s sake.
No too-sick-to-board, inside-pooping, adult-dog-agitating, needle-tooth puppies round babies! Period.
This is not even a query.
Your no-dogs coverage with friends is additionally not up for debate. Your house, your guidelines.
That they’re howling about this does not make their case any stronger; it simply provides large boundary issues to their aspect of the steadiness sheet, as well as to the child-endangering recklessness.
There could also be a lot for you to personal on this “long contentious history” with Sally — your description is leaking some contempt — so watch that. But even when so, you may want to begin the patching-up course of another time and in another method — one that does not put little crawling folks in danger.
Re: Puppy: Drawing the road and saying no to the pet is a job for the husband, proper? It’s his household. It appears like they’re in settlement on this however that Uncomfortable is having to take the lead in coping with this downside.
Anonymous: Why the husband hasn’t shut them down totally can be a thriller, besides that he’s a product of their (presumably) boundary-challenged house.
Re: Puppy: I’d love to hear, right here or within the feedback, from the canine individuals who really assume this is okay. Why do you assume it’s acceptable to pressure your pet on individuals who have mentioned no? It’s so widespread.
— I JUST DON’T GET IT
I JUST DON’T GET IT: I don’t get it both and I’m very connected to my canines. Who, by the way in which, are getting extra good-looking proper now as I kind this.
I hold listening to about individuals who refuse to take no-dogs for a solution — however I don’t actually hear from them. Anyone care to personal up? Service canines excepted, clearly.